Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!tor-network!not-for-mail
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.net>
Newsgroups: talk.politics.guns
Subject: Re: Gun Violence Archive
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 22:52:48 -0400
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <101j3m1$3aje7$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <2a9m3khpv48hg31mpej28jqhpkvgu23bl1@4ax.com>
 <101grko$32chq$1@paganini.bofh.team>
 <qtmo3k9gk3ndbeuljamr87ocgi5fkbghb9@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 02:52:49 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="3493319"; posting-host="D9l9c6dJVR6kCy7hGUn/aQ.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-TOR-Router: sha256:NDUuOTAuMTg1LjExOA== --
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Content-Language: en-US

!Jones wrote:
>> Hut-Sut Ralson wrote:
> [...]
>>> As of today, May 31, 2025, there have been zero documented defensive
>>> gun uses in the United States for the year 2025.  You might notice
>>> that I avoid the acronym "DGU", popularized by Dr Kleck's '90s surveys
>>> where the researcher defines a "DGU" as an answer to an anonymous
>>> telephone survey... if it's your survey, you may define it any way you
>>> wish.  To be a "defensive gun use", the incident must be tested by the
>>> scientific method
>>
>> That's a clear misapplication of the scientific method.
> 
> Well, I did, in fact, use the term: "scientific method"; however, I
> did not detail any specific application thereof.

So you're just blabbering. Got it.