Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<101joed$9or6$1@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Is Fernando Pereira still alive? (Was: Who was Fernando Pereira?)
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:47:11 +0200
Message-ID: <101joed$9or6$1@solani.org>
References: <101jo6m$9oku$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 08:47:09 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="320358"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+4HaM/+PoMdSFzculMnxssm60rI=
In-Reply-To: <101jo6m$9oku$1@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwNy8EBwCAIA8CVQEjQcYqa/Ueoz3scgs5dSTAhaE/O5an0u3ajgc/Mmu7jniyjrWhXIDSsFPaMyXFeOor8ASyDFAg=


I find his name on this arvix paper:

Gemma: Open Models Based on Gemini Research and Technology
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08295

He features as an Executive Sponsor.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> When I look at the file it shows me:
> 
> Some of the benchmarks are inspired on a benchmark suite developed at
> ICOT for their SIM project, and other benchmark choices were
> influenced by discussions with ICOT researchers on the relative
> performance of SIM-I vs.  Prolog-20.
> 
> -- Fernando Pereira
> 
> But the file name has probably a typo:
> 
> samples/peirera.pl
> 
> Pay respect to the ancestors, and write their names correctly.
> 
> Its obviously nonsense, because the original name was:
> 
> These benchmarks are designed to identify
> pereira.tar Fernando Pereira's benchmarks (26-DEC-86)
> pereira.txt
> 
> https://github.com/ashok-khanna/cmu-ai-repository/blob/main/lang/prolog/code/bench/0.html 
> 
> 
> These tests are a nice piece of history and
> require some research to get the names right.