Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Good news: Apple finally stopped putting garbage RAM in the
 iPhone
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:40:13 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <101knlt$3ds02$3@dont-email.me>
References: <101f2tb$6to$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <101f59j$172hg$1@dont-email.me>
 <ASudndGIMob1-KH1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <101hv61$7n8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <an6dndohvdF3W6H1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@supernews.com>
 <101itqt$2fgl$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <101juv3$389hk$1@dont-email.me>
 <101kccj$25iv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2025 19:40:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="726add861c5aeb578beb59f581127ced";
	logging-data="3600386"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/iJOVZrCvuCrlBNsjBOTu/0ZIGrl9+VvA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:y2V4HvYNJfz2h+/57FsC7b1qi0g=
In-Reply-To: <101kccj$25iv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Content-Language: en-CA

On 2025-06-02 07:27, Marion wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 10:38:27 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :
> 
> 
>> He is 100% correct. Someone who regularly tops badgolferman's monthly list
>> by a significant margin can only be a troll.
> 
> Maybe. Or maybe he's refuting the Apple trolls, Chris.
> 
>>> 1. You can look up the battery capacity, Tyrone.
>>> 2. And you can look up the EU bare-minimum specs, too.
>>
>> 1 & 2 are unrelated.
> 
> That is not correct but it would be an interesting discussion in and of
> itself, Chris, as the primary battery wattage consumers are generally the
> same across both platforms, given Apple doesn't have special physics like
> they claimed with their "special" battery chemistry (i.e., Apple lied).

The primary consumers may be the same TYPES of components...

....that doesn't mean that consume the same AMOUNT of power.

> 
> The display is going to be the biggest hog, so if we assume similar
> displays in similarly spec'd Android/iOS devices, it's gonna be #1.

"ASSume", you ass.

> 
> Specifically, the larger the screen, the higher the resolution (e.g., Quad
> HD vs. Full HD), and the brighter the screen, the more power it consumes.
> High refresh rates (like 90Hz or 120Hz) also contribute significantly.
> 
> The CPU/GPU will use the next most amount of power, where Android's
> typically have more cores than Apple CPUs where, of course, what you do
> with the device (gaming, streaming, multitasking, AI, etc.) will have to be
> normalized between the two test devices to make any fair comparison.

And the CPUs/GPUs are definitely different between iPhones and 
everything else.

And Apple's A series processors are top or near the top in both speed 
and power efficiency.

<snip>