Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for
 Trump deportees:
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2025 23:53:07 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <101ofv5$ilu4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <atmo3khh39c4ourcmsomm5smij938e6ai2@4ax.com>
 <101hsku$26lq0$6@dont-email.me> <javo3kh338hi3btp8df8llti02i6q7ra0h@4ax.com>
 <101i16r$2ados$1@dont-email.me> <101lkqh$3kj7o$1@dont-email.me>
 <pnct3k1grlt8flup51ass2pgtactgkfnrd@4ax.com> <101mrjn$aqa$1@dont-email.me>
 <101n4p9$2sls$1@dont-email.me> <101n69j$40c7$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: frkrygow@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 05:53:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cd3bdef4863cc79cdb9178e77915e25b";
	logging-data="612292"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+epMLpVocsCqG8rdVkVXqK90CxPpmZUPE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:r8/z7cFt1kRoj41cSU8bAZNh8u0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <101n69j$40c7$1@dont-email.me>

On 6/3/2025 12:01 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 6/3/2025 10:36 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>> On 6/3/2025 8:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>
>>> There was a false statement inserted into a filing in re Kilmar 
>>> Abrego Garcia that he had been deported in error. The Justice 
>>> Department employee who added that was fired the next morning and the 
>>> filing emended...
>>
>> Got a citation or other evidence for that claim? And what did the 
>> courts say about this issue? And where is Mr. Garcia now?
>>
>>> As Monday morning's NYT for example, whose front page did not cover 
>>> the immolation of live US citizens, including a Holocaust survivor, 
>>> in Boulder by an illegal jihadi screaming 'free palestine.' Deemed 
>>> not interesting enough by editorial staff.
>>
>> I don't get a print edition of NYT; but your complaint seems to be 
>> that eight people getting various degrees of burns did not get enough 
>> attention, despite it being on every news outlet. It looks to me like 
>> NYT has since done many articles on the incident and its implications. 
>> Are you trying to say NYT does sufficiently protest antisemitism?
>>
>> And BTW, what happened was despicable. As you know, I'm firmly against 
>> attempts to harm or kill groups of innocent people. But "immolation of 
>> live US citizens" is more than a little exaggerated. It usually means 
>> burning to death. I gather only one person out of the eight was 
>> seriously burned.
>>
>> There's no excuse for the attack, but you can slightly relax your grip 
>> on your own pearls!
>>
> 
> Airlifted to regional burn center is more serious than any burn I've 
> ever suffered. HIPA once again interferes with the details but here's 
> the expert:
> 
> https://kdvr.com/news/local/burn-surgeon-speaks-on-boulder-terror- 
> attack-victims-recovery-while-few-still-remain-in-hospital/
> 
> Six of the 12 victims were not bandaged and discharged. They remain at 
> the burn center. These are serious injuries.

Serious injuries? Yes, and I wouldn't want them. Immolation? No, not by 
definition. And your article, while related, is devoid of actual 
information about the seriousness of the burns.

I'd be happy with the following edit of your statement: "... whose front 
page did not cover the serious burn injuries of a few U.S. citizens ..."

-- 
- Frank Krygowski