| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101on0k$ko7o$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz>
Newsgroups: sci.lang
Subject: Re: King and Queen
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:53:16 +1200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <101on0k$ko7o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <101mgep$3u80s$1@dont-email.me>
<slrn103uf5n.30kf.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
Reply-To: r.clark@auckland.ac.nz
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 07:53:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c2a3ea6bc9e0232816da3da321733ce7";
logging-data="680184"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CmFlV7uFLf7+Z9wXbunGw0vyJLU5SHtc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rxspNzSgb2MffBFTlPqWGod6Pck=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <slrn103uf5n.30kf.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>
On 4/06/2025 6:19 a.m., Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> On 2025-06-03, Ross Clark <benlizro@ihug.co.nz> wrote:
>
>> Today, by contrast, is "Queen's Birthday" in Thailand -- actual birthday
>> of the actual reigning Queen ("former air hostess"),
>
> Hmm. So a "reigning queen" is not a "queen regnant"?
>
I don't know. All I meant to say was that she was in fact the current
holder of that title. I don't profess to be an expert in things Royal,
and "regnant" is not really even in my vocabulary. Dictionaries were not
very helpful, simply defining "regnant" as "reigning". I thought I knew
what "reign" meant, but I probably learned that from reading mostly
about kings. But as helpfully explained by Blackstone (1765), quoted in
OED, "regnant" means "holds the crown in her own right". So (I guess)
Suthida is not regnant, does not reign.
Monarchs, then, can have spouses who do not reign. Could two people be
co-regnant? Wiliam III and Mary II, apparently, were co-monarchs
(1689-1694). I can't remember how that was worked out, though we heard
about it in high school. Or how William got to be "William III and II",
as I just read somewhere.