Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for
 Trump deportees:
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:35:21 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 67
Message-ID: <101pi2m$rahk$2@dont-email.me>
References: <atmo3khh39c4ourcmsomm5smij938e6ai2@4ax.com>
 <101hsku$26lq0$6@dont-email.me> <javo3kh338hi3btp8df8llti02i6q7ra0h@4ax.com>
 <101i16r$2ados$1@dont-email.me> <101lkqh$3kj7o$1@dont-email.me>
 <pnct3k1grlt8flup51ass2pgtactgkfnrd@4ax.com> <101mrjn$aqa$1@dont-email.me>
 <101n4p9$2sls$1@dont-email.me> <101n69j$40c7$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ofv5$ilu4$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:35:19 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="574bfc2ccfb3bfd0c3a199719d95e1da";
	logging-data="895540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19dd1x6zUNqUhR6XhdwDz3R"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZMsMe8gP/dYpAQXsxN0NoO3/Eqw=
In-Reply-To: <101ofv5$ilu4$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 6/3/2025 10:53 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
> On 6/3/2025 12:01 PM, AMuzi wrote:
>> On 6/3/2025 10:36 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2025 8:59 AM, AMuzi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There was a false statement inserted into a filing in re 
>>>> Kilmar Abrego Garcia that he had been deported in error. 
>>>> The Justice Department employee who added that was fired 
>>>> the next morning and the filing emended...
>>>
>>> Got a citation or other evidence for that claim? And what 
>>> did the courts say about this issue? And where is Mr. 
>>> Garcia now?
>>>
>>>> As Monday morning's NYT for example, whose front page 
>>>> did not cover the immolation of live US citizens, 
>>>> including a Holocaust survivor, in Boulder by an illegal 
>>>> jihadi screaming 'free palestine.' Deemed not 
>>>> interesting enough by editorial staff.
>>>
>>> I don't get a print edition of NYT; but your complaint 
>>> seems to be that eight people getting various degrees of 
>>> burns did not get enough attention, despite it being on 
>>> every news outlet. It looks to me like NYT has since done 
>>> many articles on the incident and its implications. Are 
>>> you trying to say NYT does sufficiently protest 
>>> antisemitism?
>>>
>>> And BTW, what happened was despicable. As you know, I'm 
>>> firmly against attempts to harm or kill groups of 
>>> innocent people. But "immolation of live US citizens" is 
>>> more than a little exaggerated. It usually means burning 
>>> to death. I gather only one person out of the eight was 
>>> seriously burned.
>>>
>>> There's no excuse for the attack, but you can slightly 
>>> relax your grip on your own pearls!
>>>
>>
>> Airlifted to regional burn center is more serious than any 
>> burn I've ever suffered. HIPA once again interferes with 
>> the details but here's the expert:
>>
>> https://kdvr.com/news/local/burn-surgeon-speaks-on- 
>> boulder-terror- attack-victims-recovery-while-few-still- 
>> remain-in-hospital/
>>
>> Six of the 12 victims were not bandaged and discharged. 
>> They remain at the burn center. These are serious injuries.
> 
> Serious injuries? Yes, and I wouldn't want them. Immolation? 
> No, not by definition. And your article, while related, is 
> devoid of actual information about the seriousness of the 
> burns.
> 
> I'd be happy with the following edit of your statement: "... 
> whose front page did not cover the serious burn injuries of 
> a few U.S. citizens ..."
> 

Odd how two people can watch a video of an old lady rolling 
in pain under flames and see different things. YMMV.

-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971