| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101pom2$t5ks$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Good news: Apple finally stopped putting garbage RAM in the iPhone Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 08:28:02 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <101pom2$t5ks$1@dont-email.me> References: <101f2tb$6to$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <101f59j$172hg$1@dont-email.me> <ASudndGIMob1-KH1nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@supernews.com> <101hv61$7n8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <an6dndohvdF3W6H1nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@supernews.com> <101itqt$2fgl$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <101juv3$389hk$1@dont-email.me> <101kccj$25iv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <101ktmn$3fp20$1@dont-email.me> <101m2cp$1e7g$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <101m7u4$3sfou$1@dont-email.me> <101m8ok$6m9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <101ot1g$mms5$1@dont-email.me> <101po52$2p2e$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2025 17:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="099f83fdf4239f6263276c1fa3f6707b"; logging-data="956060"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18383K32ayUmkfVj2yDiCeUSBn/HZYGjcQ=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:674ok8GJso3y15ShfrJn/Hs7MTg= Content-Language: en-CA In-Reply-To: <101po52$2p2e$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> On 2025-06-04 08:18, Marion wrote: > On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 07:36:16 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote : > > >> You've made no maths argument. Come back with a fully formulated equation. > > Your claim is mathematically absurd. > Apple doesn't have their own proprietary laws of physics/chemistry. > > Everyone knows that two devices which use equal amounts of power, the Apple > device having a battery half the size of the Android, will reach the 80% > degradation point from charge cycles at vastly different times (in years). And like that you present a personal assumption of yours as fact. You don't know that those two devices use equal amounts of power. And then there's another assumption in there you're just trying to glide by: that iPhones have batteries that are "half the size". > > Your claim that they don't is simply preposterously absurd. > > Specifically, you claim that Apple has special physics known only to them. > Which is absurd. > > But you're an Apple troll. > So you'll believe anything that Apple feeds you to believe. > > Even though everything you claim defies physics.