| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101qq0v$14gff$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy Subject: Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1 Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:57:03 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 126 Message-ID: <101qq0v$14gff$3@dont-email.me> References: <101khcl$3bfvj$6@dont-email.me> <101mbnh$3sodg$1@dont-email.me> <101njgb$7qau$3@dont-email.me> <4113b5c3cb0e33212819ef36a4de858e40e70cba@i2pn2.org> <101noka$8rb8$4@dont-email.me> <101o96g$db96$3@dont-email.me> <101ob1t$hd6o$3@dont-email.me> <101obrf$hlr6$1@dont-email.me> <101ocan$hd6o$6@dont-email.me> <101ochl$i3m6$1@dont-email.me> <101oda2$hd6o$8@dont-email.me> <101oe1m$i3m6$3@dont-email.me> <101oee0$hd6o$9@dont-email.me> <101oeik$i3m6$4@dont-email.me> <101ofvi$inkg$1@dont-email.me> <101pask$pv5r$1@dont-email.me> <101porr$ta6v$1@dont-email.me> <101qb4p$11sr2$1@dont-email.me> <101qbtj$11qlg$1@dont-email.me> <101qc32$11sr2$3@dont-email.me> <101qhst$13bo7$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 02:57:03 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7a75ad72c7c9f6fd0ca7001367c21b2a"; logging-data="1196527"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18oVpqlIg2H1/gh6fnHg5pC" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:gtkjKxk7gf6chCQljs6qOXyrcVw= In-Reply-To: <101qhst$13bo7$1@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250604-12, 6/4/2025), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 6964 On 6/4/2025 5:38 PM, olcott wrote: > On 6/4/2025 3:59 PM, dbush wrote: >> On 6/4/2025 4:56 PM, olcott wrote: >>> On 6/4/2025 3:43 PM, dbush wrote: >>>> On 6/4/2025 11:31 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>> On 6/4/2025 6:32 AM, dbush wrote: >>>>>> On 6/3/2025 11:53 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Counter-factual as anyone that understands >>>>>>> the x86 language can clearly see. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _DDD() >>>>> [00002183] 55 push ebp >>>>> [00002184] 8bec mov ebp,esp >>>>> [00002186] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD >>>>> [0000218b] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH >>>>> [00002190] 83c404 add esp,+04 >>>>> [00002193] 5d pop ebp >>>>> [00002194] c3 ret >>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002194] >>>>> >>>>> // First four instructions of DDD emulated by HHH1 >>>>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:1138d9 >>>>> [00002183][001138c9][001138cd] 55 push ebp ; DDD of HHH1 >>>>> [00002184][001138c9][001138cd] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; DDD of HHH1 >>>>> [00002186][001138c5][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD >>>>> [0000218b][001138c1][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH >>>>> New slave_stack at:14e2f9 >>>>> >>>>> // First four instructions of DDD emulated by emulated HHH >>>>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:15e301 >>>>> [00002183][0015e2f1][0015e2f5] 55 push ebp ; DDD of >>>>> HHH[0] >>>>> [00002184][0015e2f1][0015e2f5] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; DDD of >>>>> HHH[0] >>>>> [00002186][0015e2ed][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD >>>>> [0000218b][0015e2e9][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH >>>>> New slave_stack at:198d21 >>>>> >>>>> // First four instructions of DDD emulated by emulated emulated HHH >>>>> [00002183][001a8d19][001a8d1d] 55 push ebp ; DDD of >>>>> HHH[1] >>>>> [00002184][001a8d19][001a8d1d] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; DDD of >>>>> HHH[1] >>>>> [00002186][001a8d15][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD >>>>> [0000218b][001a8d11][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH >>>>> Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> False, as the side-by-side trace show exactly that and as you have >>>>>> admitted on the record *multiple times*: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There isn't enough room to put them side-by-side. >>>>> The first paragraph is HHH1 simulating DDD >>>>> The second paragraph is HHH simulating DDD >>>>> The third paragraph is HHH simulating itself DDD >>>>> >>>>> There is no corresponding HHH1 simulating itself >>>> >>>> >>>> Irrelevent. A simulation by definition is not affected by what >>>> happened before the simulation started. >>>> >>>> What is relevant is that both HHH and HHH1 simulate DDD once, which >>>> includes simulating the code of HHH which in turn simulates DDD, and >>>> both are the same up to the point that HHH aborts, which you have >>>> admitted *multiple times* on the record: >>>> >>> >>> The simulation of DDD by HHH1 and HHH is exactly the same >>> until HHH begins emulating itself (HHH1 never does this). >>> >> >> False, as you have *explicitly* admitted: >> >> >> >> On 6/4/2025 12:38 PM, olcott wrote: >> > On 6/4/2025 4:20 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote: >> >> >> >> That did not answer the question: WHAT INSTRUCTION, correctly >> simulated did that? >> > >> > When HHH1(DDD) simulates DDD it never simulates itself. >> > When HHH(DDD) simulates DDD then simulates itself simulating >> > DDD the first instruction that this simulated HHH simulates >> > diverges from the simulation that HHH1 did. >> > >> >> You cannot point to any instruction interpreted differently by the >> two simulators. >> > >> > There are no instructions interpreted differently. >> > > HHH1(DDD) emulates DDD once and never emulates itself. > HHH(DDD) emulates DDD then emulates itself emulating DDD. > > the first instruction of DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself > is one more instruction of DDD than HHH1 ever emulates. > > the 2nd instruction of DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself > is now two more instructions of DDD than HHH1 ever emulates. > > the 3nd instruction of DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself > is now three more instructions of DDD than HHH1 ever emulates. > DDD emulated by HHH1 DDD emulated by HHH [00002183] push ebp [00002183] push ebp [00002184] mov ebp,esp [00002184] mov ebp,esp [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself [00002183] push ebp ; [00002184] mov ebp,esp ; [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH -- Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer