Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<101qq0v$14gff$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2025 19:57:03 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 126
Message-ID: <101qq0v$14gff$3@dont-email.me>
References: <101khcl$3bfvj$6@dont-email.me> <101mbnh$3sodg$1@dont-email.me>
 <101njgb$7qau$3@dont-email.me>
 <4113b5c3cb0e33212819ef36a4de858e40e70cba@i2pn2.org>
 <101noka$8rb8$4@dont-email.me> <101o96g$db96$3@dont-email.me>
 <101ob1t$hd6o$3@dont-email.me> <101obrf$hlr6$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ocan$hd6o$6@dont-email.me> <101ochl$i3m6$1@dont-email.me>
 <101oda2$hd6o$8@dont-email.me> <101oe1m$i3m6$3@dont-email.me>
 <101oee0$hd6o$9@dont-email.me> <101oeik$i3m6$4@dont-email.me>
 <101ofvi$inkg$1@dont-email.me> <101pask$pv5r$1@dont-email.me>
 <101porr$ta6v$1@dont-email.me> <101qb4p$11sr2$1@dont-email.me>
 <101qbtj$11qlg$1@dont-email.me> <101qc32$11sr2$3@dont-email.me>
 <101qhst$13bo7$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 02:57:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7a75ad72c7c9f6fd0ca7001367c21b2a";
	logging-data="1196527"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18oVpqlIg2H1/gh6fnHg5pC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gtkjKxk7gf6chCQljs6qOXyrcVw=
In-Reply-To: <101qhst$13bo7$1@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250604-12, 6/4/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 6964

On 6/4/2025 5:38 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 6/4/2025 3:59 PM, dbush wrote:
>> On 6/4/2025 4:56 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/4/2025 3:43 PM, dbush wrote:
>>>> On 6/4/2025 11:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/4/2025 6:32 AM, dbush wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/3/2025 11:53 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Counter-factual as anyone that understands
>>>>>>> the x86 language can clearly see.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _DDD()
>>>>> [00002183] 55             push ebp
>>>>> [00002184] 8bec           mov ebp,esp
>>>>> [00002186] 6883210000     push 00002183 ; push DDD
>>>>> [0000218b] e833f4ffff     call 000015c3 ; call HHH
>>>>> [00002190] 83c404         add esp,+04
>>>>> [00002193] 5d             pop ebp
>>>>> [00002194] c3             ret
>>>>> Size in bytes:(0018) [00002194]
>>>>>
>>>>> // First four instructions of DDD emulated by HHH1
>>>>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation   Execution Trace Stored at:1138d9
>>>>> [00002183][001138c9][001138cd] 55         push ebp      ; DDD of HHH1
>>>>> [00002184][001138c9][001138cd] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; DDD of HHH1
>>>>> [00002186][001138c5][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
>>>>> [0000218b][001138c1][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH
>>>>> New slave_stack at:14e2f9
>>>>>
>>>>> // First four instructions of DDD emulated by emulated HHH
>>>>> Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation   Execution Trace Stored at:15e301
>>>>> [00002183][0015e2f1][0015e2f5] 55         push ebp      ; DDD of 
>>>>> HHH[0]
>>>>> [00002184][0015e2f1][0015e2f5] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; DDD of 
>>>>> HHH[0]
>>>>> [00002186][0015e2ed][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
>>>>> [0000218b][0015e2e9][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH
>>>>> New slave_stack at:198d21
>>>>>
>>>>> // First four instructions of DDD emulated by emulated emulated HHH
>>>>> [00002183][001a8d19][001a8d1d] 55         push ebp      ; DDD of 
>>>>> HHH[1]
>>>>> [00002184][001a8d19][001a8d1d] 8bec       mov ebp,esp   ; DDD of 
>>>>> HHH[1]
>>>>> [00002186][001a8d15][00002183] 6883210000 push 00002183 ; push DDD
>>>>> [0000218b][001a8d11][00002190] e833f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH
>>>>> Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> False, as the side-by-side trace show exactly that and as you have 
>>>>>> admitted on the record *multiple times*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There isn't enough room to put them side-by-side.
>>>>> The first paragraph is HHH1 simulating DDD
>>>>> The second paragraph is HHH simulating DDD
>>>>> The third paragraph is HHH simulating itself DDD
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no corresponding HHH1 simulating itself
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Irrelevent.  A simulation by definition is not affected by what 
>>>> happened before the simulation started.
>>>>
>>>> What is relevant is that both HHH and HHH1 simulate DDD once, which 
>>>> includes simulating the code of HHH which in turn simulates DDD, and 
>>>> both are the same up to the point that HHH aborts, which you have 
>>>> admitted *multiple times* on the record:
>>>>
>>>
>>> The simulation of DDD by HHH1 and HHH is exactly the same
>>> until HHH begins emulating itself (HHH1 never does this).
>>>
>>
>> False, as you have *explicitly* admitted:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/2025 12:38 PM, olcott wrote:
>>  > On 6/4/2025 4:20 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>  >>
>>  >> That did not answer the question: WHAT INSTRUCTION, correctly 
>> simulated did that?
>>  >
>>  > When HHH1(DDD) simulates DDD it never simulates itself.
>>  > When HHH(DDD) simulates DDD then simulates itself simulating
>>  > DDD the first instruction that this simulated HHH simulates
>>  > diverges from the simulation that HHH1 did.
>>  >
>>  >> You cannot point to any instruction interpreted differently by the 
>> two simulators.
>>  >
>>  > There are no instructions interpreted differently.
>>
> 
> HHH1(DDD) emulates DDD once and never emulates itself.
> HHH(DDD) emulates DDD then emulates itself emulating DDD.
> 
> the first instruction of DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself
> is one more instruction of DDD than HHH1 ever emulates.
> 
> the 2nd instruction of DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself
> is now two more instructions of DDD than HHH1 ever emulates.
> 
> the 3nd instruction of DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself
> is now three more instructions of DDD than HHH1 ever emulates.
> 

DDD emulated by HHH1              DDD emulated by HHH
[00002183] push ebp               [00002183] push ebp
[00002184] mov ebp,esp            [00002184] mov ebp,esp
[00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD    [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
[0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH    [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH

DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself
[00002183] push ebp      ;
[00002184] mov ebp,esp   ;
[00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
[0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer