Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: AMD weighs in on HD versus 4K
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:55:54 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <101s7la$1ik5p$1@dont-email.me>
References: <19nb3k5q4pho824jtoqf3kbrsned4n7db6@4ax.com> <ptno3k59c56lfj0212c82oful6lspvopcv@4ax.com> <qbvo3kpki3p700vli5o5sonr435jjq6lfo@4ax.com> <101p036$naef$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 15:55:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7965d4b72a219adbcf51561f5b9c6462";
	logging-data="1659065"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ix7u+d61/PMcUEVPHkWYw"
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tQlt6avuYPQer2dEv2+wdzWyTNI=
Originator: rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Ross Ridge)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)

JAB  <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
>The strange thing is there isn't that same stigma about books even 
>though there are lots of books which are complete trash. You get the 
>same thing with watching 'too much' TV but being a bookworm is 
>considered a positive.

Every time somone talks negatively about screen time and children I think
of all the time I spent as a child with my nose in book.  It's not obvious
to me that it was really any better.  Like watching TV or YouTube videos
reading books is completely passive.  At least with some screen time
activities, like playing video games, it requires some actual thought.

It was also phyiscally harmful.  My parents used to yell at me for sitting
too close to the TV, but it was reading all those books that damaged my
eyes, leaving me me with pretty bad near-sightedness.

-- 
 l/  //	  Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo]  rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
-()-/()/  http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca:11068/
 db  //