Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 11:53:15 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 61
Message-ID: <101si1r$1kh2e$15@dont-email.me>
References: <101khcl$3bfvj$6@dont-email.me> <101o96g$db96$3@dont-email.me>
 <101ob1t$hd6o$3@dont-email.me> <101obrf$hlr6$1@dont-email.me>
 <101ocan$hd6o$6@dont-email.me> <101ochl$i3m6$1@dont-email.me>
 <101oda2$hd6o$8@dont-email.me> <101oe1m$i3m6$3@dont-email.me>
 <101oee0$hd6o$9@dont-email.me> <101oeik$i3m6$4@dont-email.me>
 <101ofvi$inkg$1@dont-email.me> <101pask$pv5r$1@dont-email.me>
 <101porr$ta6v$1@dont-email.me> <101qb4p$11sr2$1@dont-email.me>
 <101qbtj$11qlg$1@dont-email.me> <101qc32$11sr2$3@dont-email.me>
 <101qhst$13bo7$1@dont-email.me> <101qicm$11sr2$4@dont-email.me>
 <101qjki$13i0e$1@dont-email.me> <101qn7s$14gq1$1@dont-email.me>
 <101qnp3$14gff$1@dont-email.me> <101qo1g$14gq1$2@dont-email.me>
 <101qoia$14gff$2@dont-email.me> <101qp3h$14gq1$3@dont-email.me>
 <101qqn5$14gff$4@dont-email.me> <101qrrc$14gq1$4@dont-email.me>
 <101qsfp$15bg8$1@dont-email.me> <101qt22$15d1h$1@dont-email.me>
 <101qu35$15bg8$2@dont-email.me>
 <dae2c9b3b417888d6d9da70688cb523f01ac5861@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 18:53:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7a75ad72c7c9f6fd0ca7001367c21b2a";
	logging-data="1721422"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18j+R9QsBE/JpmVMtFDoDsD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AEvXud2gcL7PNePWzIch4veOOEU=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250605-8, 6/5/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <dae2c9b3b417888d6d9da70688cb523f01ac5861@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US

On 6/5/2025 6:37 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/4/25 10:06 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/4/2025 8:48 PM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 6/4/2025 9:39 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/4/2025 8:28 PM, dbush wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> DDD emulated by HHH1 emulating HHH  DDD emulated by HHH emulating HHH
>>> [00002183] push ebp      ;          [00002183] push ebp      ;
>>> [00002184] mov ebp,esp   ;          [00002184] mov ebp,esp   ;
>>> [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD      [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
>>> [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH      [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH
>>>                                      ### HHH aborts ###
>>>
>>
>> *That is dishonest*
>> HHH1 emulates DDD once and this matches
>> the first time that HHH emulates DDD.
>>
>> DDD emulated by HHH1              DDD emulated by HHH
>> [00002183] push ebp               [00002183] push ebp
>> [00002184] mov ebp,esp            [00002184] mov ebp,esp
>> [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD    [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
>> [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH    [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH
>>
>> *THE MATCHING IS NOW USED UP*
>> *THE MATCHING IS NOW USED UP*
>> *THE MATCHING IS NOW USED UP*
> 
> Right, becuase HHH gives up when HHH1 proves that the complete emulation 
> would halt.
> 
>>
>> *Then DDD emulated by HHH diverges from DDD emulated by HHH1*
>>
>> DDD emulated by HHH emulating itself
>> [00002183] push ebp      ;
>> [00002184] mov ebp,esp   ;
>> [00002186] push 00002183 ; DDD
>> [0000218b] call 000015c3 ; HHH
>>
>>
> 
> Which is the emulation done by HHH1, that shows that HHH will abort and 
> return 0 and thus DDD halts.
> 

The above is not an emulation done by HHH1
it is done by a simulated simulated HHH.

You have to keep the basic facts straight
or you will never understand.

> Which goes against the INCORRECT assumptions that HHH used, and thus HHH 
> was just incorrect, and you are proven to not understand how logic works,
> 


-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer