| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<101uklq$282v1$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Why Billie Piper Was Cast... [article] Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 21:50:20 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <101uklq$282v1$4@dont-email.me> References: <xn0p6on2a6z1h1z000@post.eweka.nl> <101sbcf$1js19$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p6ovt77au8nd006@post.eweka.nl> <101suv9$1oia9$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p6q19x8dyuvy006@news.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 13:50:19 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a2e89d53805bb4f64630b7f4eaaa8ea9"; logging-data="2362337"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/U2cDfrjOCNJR4PPYPC7NH" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20 Cancel-Lock: sha1:B/hXDVcr053OixgiA68DNNjrauI= X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250606-0, 6/6/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <xn0p6q19x8dyuvy006@news.eternal-september.org> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean On 6/06/2025 7:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote: > The True Doctor wrote: >> On 05/06/2025 16:08, Blueshirt wrote: >>> >>> I have to agree with you that Billie Piper's casting was a >>> gimmick, but it's done now and she's there... in whatever role >>> RTD has planned for her. >>> >>> Is she the 16th Doctor? The Bad Wolf? Or Rose Tyler leaking >>> through the reality glitches from the alternate universe? There's >>> only one way to find out... stay tuned. >> >> Let's make it easier. Retcon it as a bad dream and start again from >> Paul McGann giving him the full series he deserved. > > Big Finish gave Paul McGann plenty of stories, so there's no point in > going back to him. It's easier for you to just put everything since > 1996 down to a bad dream from your point of view and go forward with > the 16th Doctor Surely that would then be "The New Ninth Doctor"!! > ... it's your head-canon after all. > -- Daniel70