Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho,uk.media.tv.sf.drwho
Subject: Re: Fans ARE FURIOUS At Billie Piper As Doctor Who Revelation From
 BBC
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2025 22:28:27 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <1021b98$31ik9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <101pd77$pv5h$14@dont-email.me> <101s18j$1gp0p$4@dont-email.me>
 <101skig$1lqq6$4@dont-email.me>
 <e721fd0baee252ccdb1e821fee3f99f8@www.novabbs.com>
 <101uta3$270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2025 14:28:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3bfd8eaa1584c13ffce344aa68fdc68d";
	logging-data="3197577"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+xnyBjFr/3Eb5U2K0/Wtkz"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PmbkIdPUSEwKQ8ctZBnfkTq2YxM=
In-Reply-To: <101uta3$270$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 250607-0, 6/7/2025), Outbound message

On 7/06/2025 12:17 am, The Doctor wrote:
> In article <e721fd0baee252ccdb1e821fee3f99f8@www.novabbs.com>,
> Theory11  <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:36:06 +0000, Ubiquitous wrote:
>>> In article <xn0p6outf79jm86001@post.eweka.nl>, blueshirt@indigo.news
>>> wrote:
>>>> Ubiquitous wrote:
>>>>> Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully Rose is a placeholder.
>>>>>
>>>>>  From what I heard, it was a stunt to convince Disney to pay
>>>>> for another season ("Look at the ratings! People want to see
>>>>> another season!").
>>>>
>>>> Well... if the alternative is "Doctor Who" being cancelled, I
>>>> want to see another season, regardless of the ratings.
>>>
>>> I'd rather have no Doctor Who than bad Doctor Who.
>>
>> The simplest alternative is to avoid watching a television program that
>> has deteriorated in quality to the stage where it is deemed "bad" by
>> parts of its fandom.
> 
> parts?  More like a large part.

Is "a large part" not "a part"??
-- 
Daniel70