Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.tcpreset.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Claas <stefan@mailchuck.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: How good is Linux OCR?
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 23:32:42 +0200
Organization: Victor Usenet Postings
Message-ID: <1024vhq$3fnkt$1@news.tcpreset.net>
References: <1023in3$3djnq$1@news.tcpreset.net> <1024uvt$2iq7$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: c3066ed76bae8bcc0e476efb157ff758
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2025 21:32:42 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.tcpreset.net;
	logging-data="3661469"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@tcpreset.net"
User-Agent: flnews/1.3.0pre31 (for GNU/Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YqfixH3mISARweAjHbhu0fzbNeY=
X-Date: It's Sun Sep 11604 11:32:42 PM CEST 1993, the September that never ends.
X-Ed25519-Sig: b2f7069d3c84946035d8c030298d74f8ada9b47200cb5461d7431f1f059b8517
 503ee6798b91f0aea03317f1900e8463a4f180691156880d4ccc392e3c4da507
X-Ed25519-Pub: c0ffee5a36e581eb10f60b2831b3cdb955d2e7ef680dd282a8d43ad8b84b357a

Rich wrote:

> Note that Tesseract will (I think) compile for windows too, so if you 
> wanted to know "how well tesseract worked" you could just install the 
> windows version and see for yourself.

I tried tesseract under Linux. It is horrible, because of to many errors.

Regards
Stefan