Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Why I've Dropped In
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 07:37:44 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <102lt88$p02e$1@dont-email.me>
References: <0c857b8347f07f3a0ca61c403d0a8711@www.novabbs.com>
 <8addb3f96901904511fc9350c43917ef@www.novabbs.com>
 <102b5qh$1q55a$2@dont-email.me>
 <48c03284118d9d68d6ecf3c11b64a76b@www.novabbs.com>
 <102cd09$23hcu$1@dont-email.me>
 <42cac84be6fb35b9e468cc174919bc4a@www.novabbs.com>
 <102eske$2nqdn$1@dont-email.me>
 <b1157f4e66cf38dd9461927b9262ae6a@www.novabbs.com>
 <102g6b9$36ikc$1@dont-email.me> <102geum$38g45$1@dont-email.me>
 <102hfp6$3gg8a$1@dont-email.me> <102hnqs$3hv4m$3@dont-email.me>
 <dfd73e1785d1de562136a170e6cd5fbe@www.novabbs.com>
 <102jk11$4rmg$3@dont-email.me> <102k8v4$9ep2$2@dont-email.me>
 <RIi3Q.1147022$6%s6.1038509@fx12.iad> <102ki8f$cf36$1@dont-email.me>
 <d5fcf102c3318c410f2940bcbe76893f@www.novabbs.com>
 <10bc6d62468e8f6bfbf2882d8b929941@www.novabbs.com>
 <102lf0c$maec$2@dont-email.me>
 <4c16aaaced7fbdfb78d7ab983811f70f@www.novabbs.com>
 <95109b823470f27305490fbe3abb30d4@www.novabbs.com>
 <2868d15e335eb22735478eae09451f8c@www.novabbs.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 09:37:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="81c754bbd4d28bbc9deba01a7daf3b23";
	logging-data="819278"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18A3NXBqpxjq99fkJXt7B9WalfEcnGTN3M="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KyN4KdnaRvKh+GEmxh1f5zZ2Wag=

quadibloc <quadibloc@gmail.com> schrieb:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 4:04:04 +0000, quadibloc wrote:
>
>> I have found out that I was mistaken in my earlier posting.
>>
>> TSS/360 may have been a slow, inefficient, and poorly received
>> time-sharing operating system for the System/360 by IBM.
>>
>> However, it only ran on the System/360 Model 67, and so it did *not*
>> attempt the kind of kludge I described as a desperate way of working
>> without the availability of address translation. Its poor performance
>> must have been the result of other causes.
>
> IBM also had something called TSO, for Time-Sharing Option, and that did
> run on System/360 models other than the Model 67, and so IBM may
> actually have used the kind of kludge I had described after all.

IIRC, TSO came later.