Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about
 this point
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 11:39:34 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <10272o6$kt3u$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1025i6j$afk6$1@dont-email.me> <1025j6l$4nm5$1@dont-email.me>
 <1025jn5$aqju$1@dont-email.me> <1025kkk$4nm5$2@dont-email.me>
 <1025l2e$aqju$3@dont-email.me> <1025l7l$4nm5$3@dont-email.me>
 <1025n51$b964$2@dont-email.me> <1026i2q$h686$1@dont-email.me>
 <1026slo$j3rp$6@dont-email.me> <1026ta5$ipgg$1@dont-email.me>
 <1026ukn$k2tr$1@dont-email.me> <1026uuj$ipgg$2@dont-email.me>
 <1026vqt$kb6a$1@dont-email.me> <102703a$kcea$1@dont-email.me>
 <10270q6$ki5i$1@dont-email.me> <102715d$ipgg$3@dont-email.me>
 <10271sq$ki5i$2@dont-email.me> <10272c7$ipgg$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 18:39:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a041b768f2f60fa832e047729279e65a";
	logging-data="685182"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18kNtHkxmubCwreZxrgAWvu"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:18DIkq+WzswVtHn2VTwuPHyaxus=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250609-2, 6/9/2025), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <10272c7$ipgg$4@dont-email.me>

On 6/9/2025 11:33 AM, dbush wrote:
> On 6/9/2025 12:24 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/9/2025 11:12 AM, dbush wrote:
>>> On 6/9/2025 12:06 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> By replying to a yes or no question with the full
>>>> and complete justification forces the respondent
>>>> to look more deeply into these things than simply
>>>> dismissing a view out-of-hand without review.
>>>
>>> But by not including the yes or no you dishonestly dodge the question.
>>>
>>
>> Not at all. Not in the least little bit. By forcing my
>> reviewers to point out an error in my actual reasoning
>> I prove who is the actual ignorant one.
> 
> And since your reasoning is that the input to HHH(DDD) only includes the 
> code of the function DDD as you've stated below,

*In other words you are too stupid to understand this*

void DDD()
{
   HHH(DDD);
   return;
}

The *input* to simulating termination analyzer HHH(DDD)
specifies recursive simulation that can never reach its
*simulated "return" instruction final halt state*

*Every rebuttal to this changes the words*

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer