Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: What the Constitution, Supreme Court say about 'due process' for
 Trump deportees:
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 13:27:23 -0500
Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd.
Lines: 104
Message-ID: <102792a$mca5$2@dont-email.me>
References: <101up6r$295cs$5@dont-email.me> <101ut28$2a61j$2@dont-email.me>
 <101uvnm$2aut6$2@dont-email.me> <101vc40$2dgpg$4@dont-email.me>
 <9id64khormfkmst7ne5hr8m62v6an39frj@4ax.com>
 <i6d84kpelcviqtqev6pufsmu3oi132k2do@4ax.com>
 <ob894kdqpjjlb9julesuqcms2jeqkutbpd@4ax.com>
 <ao9c4kdo0efa0sgi6ufu7sq877nfriqtac@4ax.com>
 <ee5d4k91jn4hanomfk9a51io4fbg7gf8hu@4ax.com>
 <s1jd4k1e4p62kataqdaupv9qsk60uhi8gr@4ax.com>
 <mjkd4k9oent39jkdplsci08l7v1tpke7lu@4ax.com>
 <6i7e4kt2evo5btcj8qckp72jrnqdqrhcjc@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:27:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="84282b3258c8b736832babfd5ac7a2ad";
	logging-data="733509"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19P0OgldVQPk84SlFB2h9kL"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:oPPV7UXmqu2FcZuI2dlJ8kL6TMY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <6i7e4kt2evo5btcj8qckp72jrnqdqrhcjc@4ax.com>

On 6/9/2025 12:52 PM, Shadow wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 08:41:13 -0400, Catrike Ryder
> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 09:03:38 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 04:05:40 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 08 Jun 2025 21:14:54 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 16:32:54 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>>>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2025 09:48:55 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:48:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder
>>>>>>> <Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did
>>>>>>>> fly several times during that period and I soon realised that the crew
>>>>>>>> didn't make an issue about lowering the mask below my chin. I walked
>>>>>>>> around in three airports with the mask hanging around my neck
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 	I suppose we'll never know how many people you killed... not
>>>>>>> that you would lose a minute's sleep if it had been dozens.
>>>>>>> 	[]'s
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't be silly...  How would I have killed anyone?
>>>>>
>>>>> 	To deliberately infect someone with a disease is manslaughter
>>>>> here in Brazil, if the victim dies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I had no disease so I couldn't have infected anyone, deliberately, or
>>>> otherwise.
>>>
>>> 	How do you know? Did you do monthly tests? Note most people
>>> were carriers, did not get pneumonia. Only 2% died.
>>> 	Do a blood test today and see if you were a carrier or not.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW, there were others on the plane and in the terminal with masks
>>>> lowered or taken off.
>>>
>>> 	And there are people that shoot up schools. I fail to see how
>>> that justifies manslaughter. "They killed people so I can too".
>>
>> <EYEROLL>
>>
>>>> On the other hand, I saw morons wearing masks
>>>> out on their bikes, with nobody else within two hundred feet. I saw
>>>> other fools, all alone in their vehicles wearing masks. Now we're told
>>>> that the cloth masks were worthless, as was the need to stay six feet
>>>> apart. Some people think their nanny-governments are honest and
>>>> wonderful. I don't.  I think Fauci ought to be in prison
>>>
>>> 	Cloth masks were excellent, if combined with social
>>> distancing. New Zealand and Australia are proof of that. The disease
>>> only spread when social media belittled the government.
>>
>> Utter nonsense... The Cochrane Report concluded that there is no
>> evidence that the masks did any good.
> 
> <https://www.factcheck.org/2023/03/scicheck-what-the-cochrane-review-says-about-masks-for-covid-19-and-what-it-doesnt/>
> 
> 	And he quotes another #FAKE_NEWS.
> 	The study was compromised. They had no idea if the subjects
> used masks or not in the study.
> 
>>
>> "Seven studies took place in the community, and two studies in
>> healthcare workers. Compared with wearing no mask, wearing a mask may
>> make little to no difference in how many people caught a flu-like
>> illness (9 studies; 3507 people); and probably makes no difference in
>> how many people have flu confirmed by a laboratory test (6 studies;
>> 3005 people)."
>> https://www.cochrane.org/news/featured-review-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses
>>
>>>>> 	Probably not so in the US, or most repuglicans would be in
>>>>> jail.
>>>>> 	[]'s
>>>>
>>>> I see you've joined the "make up a nasty pseudo-name for your
>>>> opponents" club. Don't you think that's kind of juvenile?   I do.
>>>
>>> 	What they do is "Ugly". It's an accurate description.
>>> 	[]'s
>>
>> Youre momma wears combat boots.
> 
> 	Only military-dictatorship lovers do that. My mother always
> stated that the military should never be deployed INSIDE a country.
> That's what the police are for.
> 	[]'s

I do not know Brasil law.

Here, that's generally true, except for mob violence and/or 
protection of Federal facilities.

-- 
Andrew Muzi
am@yellowjersey.org
Open every day since 1 April, 1971