| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1029hhr$1aakl$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: Los Angeles Has Surrendered Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 11:04:27 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 109 Message-ID: <1029hhr$1aakl$3@dont-email.me> References: <1024gt1$3uqub$2@dont-email.me> <1027uu9$rcel$2@dont-email.me> <10283sl$1056q$1@dont-email.me> <10286kg$10ihd$2@dont-email.me> <102883e$10oac$2@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5b812ef444e87b2e7e0b6b1e9e9f7c08"; logging-data="1387157"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18y3Dz27SLJ5GOepG6kLmtaUkPaJl8LByY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:iH8lmKdKYmOC7kLE3UWc1J1syTI= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <102883e$10oac$2@dont-email.me> On 6/9/2025 11:17 PM, BTR1701 wrote: > On Jun 9, 2025 at 7:52:00 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: > >> On 6/9/2025 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Jun 9, 2025 at 5:40:44 PM PDT, "Dimensional Traveler" <dtravel@sonic.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6/9/2025 8:36 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>> Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote: >>>>>> On 6/9/2025 5:33 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >>>>>>> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>>> Encouraged by the mayor and city council, over the weekend, violent >>>>>>>> leftist protesters took to the streets and attacked police and >>>>>>>> federal agents while they were in the performance of making legal >>>>>>>> and constitutional arrests. This, of course, is the very definition >>>>>>>> of insurrection under the U.S. Code but none of our legacy media came >>>>>>>> anywhere close to using that term to describe it. Insurrection is a >>>>>>>> crime they apparently believe only conservatives can commit. . . . >>>>> >>>>>>> Over Governor Newsom's objections, Trump federalized and deployed the >>>>>>> California national guard. Newsom said army troops were unnecessary but >>>>>>> police have been using anti-riot tactics, so what's the difference. The >>>>>>> violent protests have continued for three days. News reports say that >>>>>>> national guard troops have been deployed to protect federal property. If >>>>>>> that's all they are being used for, I don't see how that usurps >>>>>>> federalism. Newsom is going to court this morning anyway. >>>>> >>>>>>> Police declared all of downtown Los Angeles "an unlawful assembly area". >>>>>>> Why didn't they just declare a straight-forward curfew? What does that >>>>>>> mean for a building owner trying to get security guards deployed? >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/06/08/national-guard-los-angeles-protests-live-updates/84103374007/ >>>>> >>>>>> Reports I had read indicated there were all of 100 protesters. >>>>> >>>>> That was Friday. Numerous other people began protesting over the next >>>>> several days. >>>>> >>>> In part because of the overboard heavy handed Trump response. >>> >>> Oh, baloney. There's nothing heavy-handed about bringing in troops to >>> protect >>> federal property during a riot. This same thing happened in 2020 when Antifa >>> goons spent more than 150 days trying to burn down the federal courthouse in >>> Portland every single night while the local police did nothing to stop them. >>> It was up to the half dozen FPS officers on duty to protect the place, so >>> Trump sent in federal agents from across the country to back them up, and >>> just >>> like you've done here, the leftists immediately blamed Trump's attempt to >>> enforce the law and protect federal property as 'provocative' and >>> 'heavy-handed'. >>> >>> It's hilarious how you guys blame Trump for the dumpster fire Democrat-run >>> cities have become, despite there being no constitutional authority for the >>> federal government to usurp police power from state and local governments. >>> The >>> president literally has no authority to do anything about it, yet the one >>> time >>> he did try and address the one small part of the problem he did have >>> authority >>> over-- protecting federal property from rioters trying to destroy it-- and >>> the >>> Left shit kittens and demanded he withdraw the 'troops' and stay out of it. >>> >>> Even those on this newsgroup were trying to pull this nonsense: >>> >>> On 9/28/2020 01:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On 9/27/2020 10:11 AM suzeeq <suzee@imbris.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Portland was a trial run for how much he [Trump] could get away with. >>> >>>> How much he could get away with?!?! >>> >>>> Trump sent federal cops to stop a federal courthouse and other federal >>>> buildings from being burned down by people whose express intent and actions >>>> indicated that's exactly what they were trying to do. And then he withdrew >>>> them after the city and state promised to do the job they'd been failing to >>>> do and protect the courthouse, a promise they almost immediately >>>> reneged on. >>> >>>> Only in 2020 could stopping arsonists from burning down government >>>> buildings be considered controversial or something the president was >>>> 'trying to get away with'. >>> >>>> Meanwhile, those same 'mostly peaceful' protesters barricaded the >>>> doors to a police station and then tried to light it on fire with about >>>> three dozen people inside-- an attempted mass murder-- and the >>>> mayor and the D.A. did literally nothing about it. >>> >>>> But Trump is the bad guy here, trying to 'get away with' something. >>> >>>> The police/NG are also deliberately shooting reporters/journalists. For >>>> the moment with rubber bullets but just the fact that they are picking >>>> them out specifically to shoot is extremely troubling. >>> >>> Notice how Dimensional doesn't seem to be "extremely troubled" by the >>> widespread violence committed by the rioters. >> >> Yes. While the rioters break laws, the cops gut principles. > > Exactly what principles have been gutted by the police in Los Angeles over the > last three days? The extreme protections we purport to afford journalists.