Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1029om9$1cir8$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Simple enough for every reader?
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:06:18 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <1029om9$1cir8$2@dont-email.me>
References: <100a8ah$ekoh$1@dont-email.me> <100much$3drk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <100p8v7$k2$1@dont-email.me> <100pbot$dmi$1@dont-email.me>
 <100rv2t$jpca$1@dont-email.me> <100sajh$lkp7$2@dont-email.me>
 <100us6p$1b4q2$1@dont-email.me> <100uvfe$1b4dh$3@dont-email.me>
 <1011fkf$1v4kb$1@dont-email.me> <1011qrn$20v83$1@dont-email.me>
 <10149ic$2jtva$1@dont-email.me> <1014kja$2l9jj$4@dont-email.me>
 <1016h9p$35it9$1@dont-email.me> <101797i$39rdb$1@dont-email.me>
 <1019bki$3qe6q$1@dont-email.me> <1019s2k$3sv8u$3@dont-email.me>
 <101bu77$dqtr$1@dont-email.me> <101cf4h$gl20$2@dont-email.me>
 <101ejtv$129q7$1@dont-email.me> <101f0rr$14h5f$2@dont-email.me>
 <101hevt$22j02$1@dont-email.me> <101hn99$25a4g$2@dont-email.me>
 <101mah1$3t0cq$1@dont-email.me> <101msm5$qln$1@dont-email.me>
 <101opv8$m16h$1@dont-email.me> <101pvvc$upfh$1@dont-email.me>
 <101rh76$1djtf$1@dont-email.me> <101sv4s$1o8bc$1@dont-email.me>
 <101u5sd$24q1b$1@dont-email.me> <101uh03$26rnt$2@dont-email.me>
 <10235vu$3lmmn$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:06:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="441fbf942db48f181ed1b0eaa2ba8f8b";
	logging-data="1461096"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+/o6uWIFw5ljD0uwimMoFQP6Xe7aD8OKE="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+3WZoHXlP6xx4fo26LQ7iRuNzIE=
In-Reply-To: <10235vu$3lmmn$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US

On 08.06.2025 07:10, Mikko wrote:
> On 2025-06-06 10:47:33 +0000, WM said:
> 
>> On 06.06.2025 09:37, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2025-06-05 20:36:45 +0000, WM said:
>>>
>>>> On 05.06.2025 09:32, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-06-04 17:32:28 +0000, WM said:
>>
>>>>> The expression "subtracting them individually" should be represented
>>>>> mathematically, e.g. a sequence. Informal expressions tend to lead
>>>>> to bad proofs.
>>>>
>>>> This expression is represented by
>>>>
>>>> ((((ℕ \ {1}) \ {2}) \ {3}) ...) = { }
>>>
>>> That may be good enough when you want to prove something that we already
>>> believe anyway. But for a sufficiently rigorous proof of something else
>>> the "..." should be replaced with something more mathematicsl.
>>
>> The "..." can be replaced with the singletons of definable natural 
>> numbers
> 
> Then do so.

See above. Three are already given. More can be inserted. But it is 
impossible to replace them with all natural numbers.

Regards, WM