Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: Everyone on this forum besides Keith has been a damned liar about
 this point
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 12:42:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <1029qph$1ah2f$20@dont-email.me>
References: <1025i6j$afk6$1@dont-email.me> <1026uuj$ipgg$2@dont-email.me>
 <1026vqt$kb6a$1@dont-email.me> <102703a$kcea$1@dont-email.me>
 <10270q6$ki5i$1@dont-email.me> <102715d$ipgg$3@dont-email.me>
 <10271sq$ki5i$2@dont-email.me> <10272c7$ipgg$4@dont-email.me>
 <10272o6$kt3u$1@dont-email.me> <10273h4$ipgg$6@dont-email.me>
 <102745p$lajf$1@dont-email.me> <10274cs$ipgg$7@dont-email.me>
 <10274ln$ldq3$1@dont-email.me> <102754h$ipgg$8@dont-email.me>
 <10275v1$lo22$1@dont-email.me> <102768b$ipgg$9@dont-email.me>
 <10276fd$lo22$2@dont-email.me> <10276pf$ipgg$10@dont-email.me>
 <10277j5$m30d$1@dont-email.me> <10278ai$ipgg$11@dont-email.me>
 <10279ha$mm0d$2@dont-email.me> <1027a5b$ipgg$12@dont-email.me>
 <1027c5c$nc63$2@dont-email.me> <1027dpf$ipgg$14@dont-email.me>
 <1027e1s$npoo$2@dont-email.me> <1027e6c$ipgg$16@dont-email.me>
 <1027gpq$ofnf$2@dont-email.me> <1027t65$r6kh$1@dont-email.me>
 <1027udi$r7bj$1@dont-email.me>
 <c99ed1b09652fac08501dc2027624dd0ab4b3e1f@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 19:42:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="668213ca1180824494e01b33326cf4e0";
	logging-data="1393743"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+t8h/CKKHXItPzwXn6Bhgo"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+jlZQw5dOT5O+1I1zXfrsdldtGU=
In-Reply-To: <c99ed1b09652fac08501dc2027624dd0ab4b3e1f@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250610-10, 6/10/2025), Outbound message

On 6/10/2025 6:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/9/25 8:31 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/9/2025 7:10 PM, Mike Terry wrote:
>>> On 09/06/2025 21:39, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 09/06/2025 20:54, dbush wrote:
>>>>>> If you would just be honest about the fact that you're not working 
>>>>>> on the halting problem, people would stop bothering
>>>>>> you.
>>>> Well, I doubt if he'll ever do that, but we could stop bothering him 
>>>> anyway. You'd be amazed at how much time you save. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Dude!!  THINK what you're suggesting!   What about all the innocent 
>>> children who might read his posts and come away with the wrong idea 
>>> about halting?  And if someone doesn't reply pointing out PO's 
>>> numerous mistakes, that would mean that PO IS RIGHT!  On the 
>>> Internet, the person who posts last in an argument WINS THAT 
>>> ARGUMENT, regardless of what that person was actualy saying - that's 
>>> "usenet rulez"...  You'ld be AGREEING WITH PO, saying that he REALLY 
>>> IS A GENIUS and everybody else here is a lying idiot!!
>>>
>>
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> Every first year computer science student that knows C
>> can confirm that DDD correctly simulated by HHH would
>> never stop running unless aborted.
>>
> 
> No, I first year computer science student would know that given the 
> above as the full definition of the input means that a correct 
> simulation of the above program is a linker error of undefined symbol HHH.
> 

Not when it is stipulated that HHH does simulate DDD
dumb ass.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer