Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: David Canzi <dmcanzi@uwaterloo.ca>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: The Apollo moon landings
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 15:37:11 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <102a1h7$1f331$1@dont-email.me>
References: <a16b2511c2fa4b644b5a5e19b1a6eb3c@www.novabbs.org>
 <102733o$3ddat$1@dont-email.me>
 <7ff1379c6fe15337b196f378c47b9ae8@www.novabbs.org>
 <1027q97$3ddat$2@dont-email.me> <1027rte$qumc$1@dont-email.me>
 <95c382f628df0cfc16ccae663752d287@www.novabbs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 21:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7308cbe09f548bed601ddc51158407e9";
	logging-data="1543265"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ltEBZKfu4kLhc5hqq6BoX"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DifCPdakizkuiPduJaZ0x7Zpz6g=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <95c382f628df0cfc16ccae663752d287@www.novabbs.org>

On 6/9/25 20:46, Bertitaylor wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 23:48:57 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:
> 
>> On 10/06/25 09:21, David Canzi wrote:
>>> On 6/9/25 18:10, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>
>>>> As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints.
>>
>>> If you make stuff up about the evidence instead of looking at the
>>> evidence, you can remain proudly wrong for the rest of your life.
> 
> Speak for yourself. The big fat impious footprints on the Moon were
> shown as evidence for Moon landing

I notice you deleted the link I provided you to a YouTube video
that shows astronauts who were not merely shuffling, but were
moving briskly.  And as a bonus, one of the astronauts stopped,
then jumped up and down vertically.  From that jump it's possible
to estimate the acceleration due to gravity, and it's way less
than on the Earth.  Here's the link again.

https://youtu.be/efzYblYVUFk?t=40

> Arindam wondered why they were that deep. Surely some 50 Kg of thrust
> spread out wide could not create that depth?

How deep are they?  Explain how you estimated the depth of
the footprints based on the image of them.  How deep should
they be?  Explain how you know how much downward pressure
the astronaut's feet exerted on the dust, and how soft that
dust is.