Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-06-11 (Wednesday)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:22:35 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <102h8mr$3f017$1@dont-email.me>
References: <102es1c$2oq2j$1@dont-email.me> <102f0c0$2p8uu$1@dont-email.me>
 <3u2m4k153t6c34d1njq600afibnld950q2@4ax.com>
 <618976151.771452338.704306.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 15:22:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3f12521994116994acb4877ac813859";
	logging-data="3637287"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/oSfjyFfEJ4+7I62Ey1DYvGuyzFOiLL0w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:AkyFsRhyw2eO90A7K8MdGlWT9Tw=
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250613-6, 6/13/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <618976151.771452338.704306.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>

On 6/12/2025 1:33 PM, anim8rfsk wrote:
> shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:48:00 -0700, "Ian J. Ball" <ijball@mac.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/12/25 8:34 AM, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
>>>
>>>> What Did You Watch?
>>>
>>> After morning errands, I played my video game all yesterday in a doomed
>>> effort to win a tournament. [roll] But I did manage to get through:
>>
>> You may have said before but what video game are you playing?
>>
>>> What did you watch?
>>
>> THE ACCOUNTANT 2: Buddy time
>>
>>
>> Seriously there was a good deal of brotherly bonding in this flick
>> that made it a bit lighter than the first one. Even though there was
>> plenty of violence and death. It also appears the accountant has quite
>> a reputation amongst the underworld.
>>
> 
> The Plex tried to get me to watch that last night. I don’t know anything
> about it. Should I watch the first one first?
> 

Yes.  They are both good movies.  The first movie establishes all the 
characters.