Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What is a photon
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:27:44 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <102hq63$3je3f$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9af3e95b721801ec23446e0d70f081b3@www.novabbs.org>
 <%5W_P.1199819$lZjd.237071@fx05.ams4> <101hdi1$2104j$1@dont-email.me>
 <3fe4ff53feee25131897dec6bed26616@www.novabbs.com>
 <101mlhj$3v6bs$1@dont-email.me>
 <b3c79148a2a73e05267102dc02069b51@www.novabbs.org>
 <101pe06$qdb4$1@dont-email.me>
 <bf5db4fb77db2aa5d2d1d9ec07759e2d@www.novabbs.org>
 <man762F2uddU1@mid.individual.net>
 <7684219ed9fcb7ee269061c10326c92d@www.novabbs.org>
 <masienFtss3U2@mid.individual.net>
 <1rdrgdh.1myz65p1yygjrzN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
 <mav29hFda1gU3@mid.individual.net> <102f8cr$2rudm$1@dont-email.me>
 <mb24q3Fsa2uU12@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 20:20:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ef77a69cd99147a4f52a98cc5fd62f2a";
	logging-data="3782767"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19lHvGOS3uP93g8Z3S+WKlP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8bGfHcX3W7nzYjIzOiVtY1VWZA8=
In-Reply-To: <mb24q3Fsa2uU12@mid.individual.net>

Den 13.06.2025 10:13, skrev Thomas Heger:
> 
> I meant, that 'speed of light' is actually an angle.
> 
> This angle is measured locally as velocity c.
> 
> In geometric terms it would be 45° and means the equality of two complex 
> intervals called 'timelike' and 'spacelike'.
> 
> For any 'influence' (all sorts of interactions in a certain space with 
> complex valued 'points', called 'spacetime') which fulfills this 
> condition, we could use the term 'light speed'.
> 
> Now light falls into this cathegory as other em-waves, too.
> 
> Now we need to attatch an axis of time to any location and place the 
> observer in the center of its local frame of reference, we could see, 
> that the past light-cone of the observer is using this angle c, while 
> the opposite means 'standstill' (actually 'relative standstill' in 
> respect to the observer).
> 
> Now I called the comoving patters 'matter' and the inverse 'axis of 
> time', hence matter and time are 'relative', too.
> 
> ...
> 
> 
> TH


I, the reader, don't understand this text, which according
to Thomas Heger is the author's fault.

So could you please write an annotated version of this text,
where you point out the errors that make me fail to understand it?

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/