| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<102lt6j$p7mn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Julio Di Egidio <julio@diegidio.name> Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog Subject: Re: Looks like they patented ChatGPT style in 2012 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 09:36:50 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <102lt6j$p7mn$1@dont-email.me> References: <102l89g$qg0l$1@solani.org> <102l8uh$qo9l$1@solani.org> <102l9nr$qoh6$1@solani.org> <102lspo$p7mm$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 09:36:52 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4eac5d6fcd1b5256fad932da2cfca53c"; logging-data="827095"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+h3dE/tXsJssFvj/wpbMwk5bHtDGfbcP8=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WsNgRa7I7LD6s+sjqCkt2VZQUoQ= Content-Language: en-GB, it In-Reply-To: <102lspo$p7mm$1@dont-email.me> On 15/06/2025 09:29, Julio Di Egidio wrote: > On 15/06/2025 04:04, Mild Shock wrote: > >> So they came up with a patent already in 2012: > > << The conceptual step of converting an abstract > representation (design or specification) of a software > system, into a more concrete representation in the form > of program code. >> > > "Already" in 2012? That's the most ridiculous as well > as the least original "invention" I have ever seen... Talking about this: Stephen Wolfram, Theodore W. Gray, "Programming in a precise syntax using natural language" <https://patents.google.com/patent/US9851950B2> And the whole cosmos is a computer system, of course! They just cannot yet figure out who pays the bill... Get the fuck out of here. *Plonk* -Julio