Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: Comprehensive current zero-day platform comparisons?
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 09:40:42 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <102m4eq$r1l5$1@dont-email.me>
References: <102chui$1n2i$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <-judnSqKqKojidf1nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <102dtpv$2rq8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <102gk3o$3a72h$1@dont-email.me>
 <102gsrn$3c813$1@dont-email.me>
 <102h1eg$3d78c$1@dont-email.me>
 <102hf8i$1nt4$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <102iebu$3omti$1@dont-email.me>
 <102iikt$1rs8$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <102k1l5$8aqu$2@dont-email.me>
 <102kk8m$2uiv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2025 11:40:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e6d61c18a46a8fe78d0069ff87a7706";
	logging-data="886437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+FzlAJZakACKLivBnyl60CL1JA/6MsjkY="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.6.1 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ClpG47Q/wsuS6vPpf9ovQRmAVQc=
	sha1:rnW7Z58WWYB26JqGg8mAVbdWAwI=

Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 14:40:37 -0000 (UTC), Chris wrote :
> 
> 
>> why not actually address Paul's comments?
> 
> The CISA report is reliable, as is the GTIG report, Chris.
> Nobody claims they are not reliable - least of which is Paul.

Is that it?! Paul didn't mention reliability. He was talking about
interpretation. Which is always your weakness. You try to infer/imply
claims which are unsupported by the data. 

> Only you claimed that these aren't facts, Chris. Not Paul. Just you.
> You *hate* every fact about Apple because Apple lied to you, Chris.

I made no such claim. Why do you always insist in lying?

The only facts I (and everyone else) deny are your so-called "facts". They
are baseless assertions. 

We are all still waiting for your evidence that all iphone batteries failed
the EU battery tests three years ago (i.e. before the regs were even
published). And for balance I'd like to see which android phones didn't
fail, with evidence. Like your god-like A32 5G whose support ended four
months ago:
https://endoflife.date/samsung-mobile

You claimed this was a "fact" that "everyone knew". 

Report by 24th June - before the new EU regs require manufacturers to label
their products - otherwise you're, yet again, full of shit. 

You've been claiming this for many months, if not years, so it'll be easy
for you. Note: referring to your own baseless threads is not evidence.