Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:31:36 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <102okpi$1h1od$1@dont-email.me>
References: <102mrt3$18oa$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <102n0nd$11tpt$1@dont-email.me> <102n1oc$17n1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <mb8l2hF1k8mU2@mid.individual.net> <102oj6s$41r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 10:31:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ad6d8e01decd269687d9d094e2a05661";
	logging-data="1607437"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/7oZs8a0irefsYJtAL8IWJ6vpaw2m/DUiDGinJ6bSxA=="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UKmMM2ULUDgLSmf0pp/7DF8uUGs=
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original

Marion,

> I know you're capable of understanding technical nuances, and
> while I also understand them, first I'll say I will never disagree
> with a sensibly logical argument. What I disagreed with was portable
> memory is not the same as portable storage - even as both are
> clearly using "memory" cards.
>
> The difference matters.

And you *still* haven't mentioned which usage you are ranting about.

> And I haven't seen a single argument where you can *replace* the
> portable storage functionality with any amount of internal storage.

I've not seen you make an argument for your side either.  And its *your* 
claim, so you are the one to start.

You don't want to ?  Than do not complain about others not doing so either.

But no, refusing to show your own cards while demanding others show theirs 
gives you the opportunity to change your tune depending on what the others 
come up with.

Kiddo, you where never smart in your attempts to manipulate the 
conversation.  You're *way* to obvious in trying to do so - as already 
indicated in my second reply here.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser