| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<102pi6b$1okp2$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Memory protection between compilation units? Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:53:31 +0100 Organization: Fix this later Lines: 21 Message-ID: <102pi6b$1okp2$1@dont-email.me> References: <20250611153239.6bc43323@mateusz> <matgqhF5m41U1@mid.individual.net> <bsg2Q.254701$S_65.88144@fx48.iad> <102f5fu$2r0js$1@dont-email.me> <9fg05k1okekamj6n4crtpdmjgmh7mn1qp5@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:53:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="212f4b5d67515e022b6ed5035e0c17bf"; logging-data="1856290"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yQBmNBNBZdLJAgs7mCExYd+U9rfbWuSFtGma31GdDLQ==" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:mWSLVPGHY2I6cHQJMv36cgiwQ7I= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <9fg05k1okekamj6n4crtpdmjgmh7mn1qp5@4ax.com> On 16/06/2025 17:14, Rosario19 wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 19:15:26 +0100, Richard Heathfield wrote: > >> Sure. Or some people prefer to single-step with a debugger. Such >> people can make their lives a little easier by surrounding the >> buffer with sentinel soldiers, setting the sentinel soldiers to a >> magic number, and putting a watch on them both - the buffer high >> soldier and the buffer low soldier. > > I think out of bound of the array many times there is a write of the 2 > limit bounds memory... but there are cases where bound are ok but > memory is written out the array the same, in some other places <whoosh> -- Richard Heathfield Email: rjh at cpax dot org dot uk "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999 Sig line 4 vacant - apply within