Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting ---
 EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 11:58:38 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <102pifu$1odus$3@dont-email.me>
References: <102n9bo$13mp8$3@dont-email.me> <102om2v$1h6pn$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 18:58:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="84f6327632bc8a50bba24a9b7508b28e";
	logging-data="1849308"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX181oKIGl9rzvq474K6DhXEm"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FfgP6tVUNngBKAynsz5jJr3WOgg=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250616-0, 6/15/2025), Outbound message
In-Reply-To: <102om2v$1h6pn$2@dont-email.me>

On 6/16/2025 3:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 15.jun.2025 om 22:10 schreef olcott:
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> When I challenge anyone to show the details of exactly
>> how DDD correctly simulated by ANY simulating termination
>> analyzer HHH can possibly reach its own simulated "return"
>> statement final halt state they ignore this challenge.
> 
> It seems very difficult for you to read.
> We clearly stated that the challenge is improper.
> HHH is incorrect 

Baseless dogmatic statements that are utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning at all DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS.

> and there is no way to make a correct HHH for all inputs.
> 
>>
>> THAT FACT THAT NOT ONE PERSON HAS MET THIS CHALLENGE
>> IN SEVERAL YEARS IS VERY STRONG EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT.
> 
> It has been proven that no correct HHH exists, 

Counter-factual, Not one person ever proved this.

> so it makes no sense to 
> challenge anybody to make a correct HHH. The challenge itself shows a 
> lack of understanding of the matter.
> 

In other words you don't have any rebuttal all you
have is dogmatic statements utterly bereft of any
supporting reasoning.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer