Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) is correct to reject its input as non-halting ---
 EVIDENCE THAT I AM CORRECT
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:26:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <102q5m6$1tklk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <102n9bo$13mp8$3@dont-email.me> <102om2v$1h6pn$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 00:26:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="63f5a31218c206cdc0eff2369981bb26";
	logging-data="2020020"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19N41NXwT6e0HpLMZXPct/I"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9SPVQS0SaAFgZWQXy6+arB14Z8s=
In-Reply-To: <102om2v$1h6pn$2@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250616-4, 6/16/2025), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US

On 6/16/2025 3:53 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 15.jun.2025 om 22:10 schreef olcott:
>> void DDD()
>> {
>>    HHH(DDD);
>>    return;
>> }
>>
>> When I challenge anyone to show the details of exactly
>> how DDD correctly simulated by ANY simulating termination
>> analyzer HHH can possibly reach its own simulated "return"
>> statement final halt state they ignore this challenge.
> 
> It seems very difficult for you to read.
> We clearly stated that the challenge is improper.

Are you too stupid to understand that dogmatic
assertions that are utterly bereft of any supporting
reasoning DO NOT COUNT AS REBUTTALS ???

Claiming that I made a mistake with no ability to
show this mistake is DISHONEST.

-- 
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer