| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<102sv76$umd4$1@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: DB Cates <cates_db@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: What is legitimate about the ID bait and switch scam at this
time?
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 18:54:14 -0500
Organization: University of Ediacara
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <102sv76$umd4$1@solani.org>
References: <102kqi6$edbo$1@dont-email.me> <102nmm2$16t4n$1@dont-email.me>
<102pfdu$1ntga$1@dont-email.me>
<20f638a655d24cf60fc28e80b5dd4819@www.novabbs.com>
<102q6fc$1tt7l$1@dont-email.me> <102q91g$1u8t3$1@dont-email.me>
<d64e7e2c30daa16b1a1c42dfe6bc79d7@www.novabbs.com>
<102s87g$2h9el$1@dont-email.me>
<c647689e8cc2441f87dbde59a2853411@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
logging-data="17877"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:JtvDVsVMkTRasXfD5hNpOx9X82c=
Return-Path: <news@reader6.news.weretis.net>
X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org
id E17BC22978C; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:54:22 -0400 (EDT)
by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9897E229783
for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:54:20 -0400 (EDT)
by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 55HNsI8c797354
(version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT)
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 01:54:19 +0200
(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256)
(No client certificate requested)
by pmx.weretis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F563E87D
for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 01:54:16 +0200 (CEST)
id C69593E850; Wed, 18 Jun 2025 01:54:15 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Language: en-CA
X-User-ID: eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXVqFUzwEH/59gQgvElQfDOZyjX+y0Niwv1+y1ZUqW9zfQUhcSWX0tD/EAE8kQ/Q==
In-Reply-To: <c647689e8cc2441f87dbde59a2853411@www.novabbs.com>
On 2025-06-17 1:30 p.m., LDagget wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 17:21:50 +0000, RonO wrote:
>
>> On 6/17/2025 10:07 AM, LDagget wrote:
>>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:23:28 +0000, RonO wrote:
>>>
> snippage
>
>> What I have always gone by was that when D and L charged tRNAs were in
>> the mix, translation still proceeded, but more slowly and L amino acids
>> were still used in making the peptide. I did not recall any type of
>> controversy involved, but the paper that I linked to noted that it has
>> never been understood why the D amino acids were not incorporated.
>
>
> As with so much biochemistry, it's complicated when you get into the
> weeds. Then again, from some perspectives, it's rather simple.
>
> The perspective I was weened on is one of kinetics. An aminoacyle
> tRNA synthetase is an enzyme that, in our modern world, catalyzes
> the joining of an L-amino acid of the right sort, to a tRNA of
> the right sort. For example, Metionine aminoacyl tRNA synthetase
> catalyzes the reaction
>
> L-Methionine + tRNA^(Met)(CAU) ==> Met-tRNA^Met(CAU)
>
> The ^ indicates the (Met) should be Met written as superscript.
> (CAU) identifies the anticodon of the tRNA.
>
> That's a reasonable description which is a good first order
> understanding of what happens. Then the fun begins. There is a variant
> of the amino acids Leucine and Isoleucine called norleucine. These are
> all amino acids whose R group is C4H9
>
> So for the generic amino acid H2 - N - CH(R) - COOH we roll through
> different substitutions for R.
>
> Leucine R group is -CH(CH3)-CH2-CH3. It branches early.
>
>
> Isoleucine R group is -CH2-C(CH3)2. It branches late.
>
> Norleucine R groupis -CH2-CH2-CH2-CH3 It does not branch.
>
> Note: Methionine has the R group CH2-CH2-S-CH3
>
> It "looks" just like Norleucine if you swap out the last CH2 for an S.
>
> And gosh darn, but Met tRNA synthetase also catalyzes the reaction
>
> L-Norleucine + tRNA^(Met)(CAU) ==> Nle-tRNA^Met(CAU)
>
> The damned thing apparently didn't read the textbook or attend
> the lectures. Our understanding is that this happens because the
> aminoacyl synthetase discriminates according to the shape of the
> amino acid but methionine and norleucine have very similar shapes.
>
> The biotech industry has witnessed significant levels of norleu
> incorporation in place of met in fermentation products. It's one of
> those things that repeats in cycles because a new generation comes
> along who read the textbooks and attended the lectures but didn't listen
> to old geezers who work for a living.
>
> It's always happening at some level. A proper biochemist will think of
> it this way.
>
> The rate at which it happens will depend upon the concentration of L-Met
> and L-Nle inside the cell synthesizing the protein. If the cells are
> being
> fed cheap Purina Cell Chow that has relatively high concentrations of
> non
> standard amino acids like Norleucine, it will happen more often. The
> enzyme
> Met aminoacyl transferase may even have a 5 or 10 fold preference for
> Met over Nle, but as synthesis progresses, and the concentration of Met
> in solution is reduced by incorporation into proteins, the ration of
> Nle to Met in the cell will increase. Other metabolic pathways will be
> at work to detect and synthesize more of amino acids whose
> concentrations
> dip, and some salvage pathways will consume other amino acids to make
> more Methionine, including consuming Norleucine, but not
> instantaneously.
>
> Not to belabor it (too late, I know) but similar competition exists
> with every amino acid tRNA aminoacyl tRNA transferase.
>
> The textbook reaction will be 100 fold, or 1000 fold faster for the
> "right" reaction for equal competing concentration. This will be true
> for L vs D forms of the same amino acid, or 'similar' amino acids. The
> specifics of the relative preferences vary.
>
> But here the punchline. It's always a competition. There are always side
> reactions. Enzymes don't read textbooks or attend lectures. They don't
> know a CORRECT reaction from an INCORRECT reaction.
>
> It's the same for DNA synthesis and so mutations happen.
>
> If anyone read this far, you're entitled to tell me to shut up.
> Apologies for being so pedantic.
>
I have been reading this thread with great interest and near zero
understanding. But I enjoy that it illustrates an understanding that I
was late to appreciate. That biology is *really* messy and the stories
we are usually told are greatly simplified and 'prettied up', leaving
out the true nature of what is actually happening. So, thank you both.
--
--
Don Cates ("he's a cunning rascal" PN)