| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1031ntn$2uv3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Camilleri" <bunkertoshimatty@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Anyone Know of Search Superior to Google? Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:20:21 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <1031ntn$2uv3$1@dont-email.me> References: <pan$4884b$6a9c628f$d04c632$4e7a047b@linux.rocks> Injection-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:20:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d83ae274b0ae1f2f4fed30d1e18e17d1"; logging-data="97251"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19PkfTl2540jFVpwG0K3El7" Cancel-Lock: sha1:6CGWELk1HTYgNO95DrKkYhfg1vY= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 If anyone has the time to develop one, servers/power to crawl and storage space to store the indexed things, it can be done. Or, you can use SearXNG. It's a meta search engine so it pulls results from Google and others if you tell it to, like Bing. Or, you can use Yacy, it's open source, like SearXNG but is P2P. Your individual computer crawls sites you put into it and it can be received by someone else on the network. "Farley Flud" <ff@linux.rocks> wrote in message news:pan$4884b$6a9c628f$d04c632$4e7a047b@linux.rocks... > I have tried the alternatives to Google search but they all > come up with inferior results. > > In spite of its evil, grubbing nature, Google search results > remain the best. > > Why, tell me why, cannot anyone else do better? > > > -- > Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.