| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1034l0o$sfo$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!panix!.POSTED.2602:f977:0:1::2!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: rec.autos.tech Subject: Re: 1998 Ford 4.2L V6 idle issue Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2025 17:49:12 -0400 (EDT) Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Message-ID: <1034l0o$sfo$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <d4dfef03090f2ae91c59680f6a20d6e89f623105@i2pn2.org> <44573a4425ef2e2201c8049d6acf5a913fa64e82@i2pn2.org> <1034i67$ceb$1@panix2.panix.com> <1034ilk$8jua$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Info: reader2.panix.com; posting-host="2602:f977:0:1::2"; logging-data="1587"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" In article <1034ilk$8jua$2@dont-email.me>, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >On 6/20/2025 4:00 PM, Scott Dorsey wrote: >> In article <44573a4425ef2e2201c8049d6acf5a913fa64e82@i2pn2.org>, >> UFO <techforce@nospam.gmx.com> wrote: >>> >>> I guess I will need a ODB code reader? Will any one do or only the older >>> ones? >> >> Maybe. 1998 was a transition year... california cars all had OBD-II, >> some trucks had OBD-II, but some cars and trucks still had OBD-I. Check >> the manual if you don't see an obvious OBD-II port. You may be having to >> count light flashes. > >Since he mostly needs to know why it's not running well, he >should probably just use the (usually free) code reading >services rather than buying a reader at this point. He might not even need that. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."