Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<10391bn$i5je$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: zen cycle <funkmasterxx@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: How are criminals arrested
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 09:44:22 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <10391bn$i5je$1@dont-email.me>
References: <7Ff5Q.1062078$%uk3.987139@fx10.iad>
 <10346bi$5ghi$1@dont-email.me> <HXh5Q.234390$VIE2.160641@fx33.iad>
 <0ccb5kd5tat0tb9ckidjpqkv7mvjm0tl6s@4ax.com> <1034h4t$85ld$3@dont-email.me>
 <ogjb5ktqt2vf07cgg458hrbl3tn0pbmo4v@4ax.com> <1034jmr$8jua$7@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 15:44:24 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e59be2bc852a41e10329daa1ccd6c545";
	logging-data="595566"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ATzkyVvcBgfIbOH+9CACceZkm6vzoEE4="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pO5M2u1E9nrq1J9g86gZAfJcXIM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1034jmr$8jua$7@dont-email.me>

On 6/20/2025 5:26 PM, AMuzi wrote:
> On 6/20/2025 4:14 PM, Shadow wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 15:43:10 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/20/2025 2:31 PM, Shadow wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 18:41:43 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri Jun 20 17:38:58 2025 Beej Jorgensen  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But at least he's going to finally get a day in court. Holy moly. 
>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>> take the easy way next time.
>>>>
>>>>     MAGAtards? I doubt it.
>>>>>
>>>>> When was the last time you served on a jury?
>>>>
>>>>     Anyone with an IQ higher than a cockroaches' usually manages
>>>> to get off a jury. If the suspect is Latino just say you don't care
>>>> much for Latinos, but don't actually hate them but would NEVER date
>>>> one. His lawyer will reject you.
>>>>     It's a PITA. You don't get paid, might even lose your job if
>>>> it takes a long time, and sometimes the family will seek revenge, or
>>>> worse, friends might think you took the wrong decision.. If you are
>>>> self employed, those days are lost.
>>>>     You will very rarely see someone with a higher education
>>>> serving in a jury here in Brazil.
>>>>     As to "Beej Jorgensen" I suspect he would avoid jury duty if
>>>> possible.
>>>>     []'s
>>>>
>>>>     Of course, there are the sociopaths that enjoy being on a
>>>> jury. They get off on the power they get to wreck someone's life for
>>>> good. The more innocent he is, the bigger the thrill when he's
>>>> convicted.
>>>>
>>>>     PS changed the subject. There is no such thing as a "illegal"
>>>> human being. Look it up in the bibel.
>>>
>>> I'll take your word on scripture but illegal aliens are
>>> deportable under USA and Brasil statutes, like most if not
>>> all countries.
>>
>>     In Brazil they have a trial. And they can appeal if that goes
>> against them. But then we're a rich country, we can afford those
>> little quirks which are practically universal in non-totalitarian
>> cultures.
>>     I hear the US is suddenly bankrupt. Maybe you really can't
>> afford it.
>>     []'s
> 
> [sigh]  This country's been broke since before I was born.
> 
> And that's reached crisis levels, not that either party want's to clip 
> their own gravy train.  It's a real problem, with real risks of real 
> pain (c.f. Argentina, Zimbabwe, etc) but they just can't keep their 
> hands out of the till...
> 
> See also discussion here in the early days of Mr Musk's noble efforts. 

You're becoming a master of sarcasm, Andrew....

> I 
> predicted that any proposed spending cuts would founder on the rocks of 
> various Congressmen's interests (majority Republican at this time but it 
> doesn't matter) and promptly sink just like Peter Grace's through and 
> specific report in 1984.  It has indeed.
> 
> 
> But, broke or not, the US is not unique in describing deportable aliens 
> in its criminal statutes.
>