| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1039hqa$m77k$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better) Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:25:14 +0100 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 31 Message-ID: <1039hqa$m77k$1@dont-email.me> References: <102t03p$2mtm4$5@dont-email.me> <54845ktc5lspgu8g0ldv591l80m4kfbe1c@4ax.com> <102tt8q$30vg8$1@dont-email.me> <21k55k5ldt6icug604e5ruggnq49qlsp5a@4ax.com> <102vjrl$3f091$2@dont-email.me> <ccl65ktr0o80a0renhlhsm2thah1int1dn@4ax.com> <102vpjc$3g5ra$1@dont-email.me> <bms85kl9kv226g7b9810j51elsf3edftki@4ax.com> <1032ehi$8dj9$1@dont-email.me> <qug95kd20774qsii65ioqt85vrs6f8aail@4ax.com> <1034s8j$amsq$3@dont-email.me> <slrn105g3cl.3rmcc.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <akhg5k9lh38u5elmkamtpq3fnq3fkbt0ik@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:25:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01d4ec0c49cb3b974b4b7239ea12869a"; logging-data="728308"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+88R4DFIWxef8WQbp263yVHy4AH6cFIRw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:SmoxzUT6Cy5ZIkZerQ5MTNlXiF8= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <akhg5k9lh38u5elmkamtpq3fnq3fkbt0ik@4ax.com> On 22/06/2025 19:10, john larkin wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:10:07 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 > <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote: > >> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 23:52 this Friday (GMT): >>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 19:16:49 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:46:26 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro >>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:46:21 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We use PADS. We've been using it since the DOS days when there was >>>>>> basically nothing else. >>>>> >>>>> Seems like it’s still around, but it’s gone cloud-only. >>>> >>>> Not for us. We purchased six copies outright. >>> >>> Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete, >>> unsupported software? >> >> >> A lot of companies do, for one reason or another. > > I inherited a hammer from my grandfather. It pounds nails just fine. I use 20 year old CAD software. IN a walled garden -- To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.