Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<1039hqa$m77k$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: SolidWorks is cool, sort of (but FreeCAD might be better)
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 19:25:14 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <1039hqa$m77k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <102t03p$2mtm4$5@dont-email.me>
 <54845ktc5lspgu8g0ldv591l80m4kfbe1c@4ax.com> <102tt8q$30vg8$1@dont-email.me>
 <21k55k5ldt6icug604e5ruggnq49qlsp5a@4ax.com> <102vjrl$3f091$2@dont-email.me>
 <ccl65ktr0o80a0renhlhsm2thah1int1dn@4ax.com> <102vpjc$3g5ra$1@dont-email.me>
 <bms85kl9kv226g7b9810j51elsf3edftki@4ax.com> <1032ehi$8dj9$1@dont-email.me>
 <qug95kd20774qsii65ioqt85vrs6f8aail@4ax.com> <1034s8j$amsq$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrn105g3cl.3rmcc.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <akhg5k9lh38u5elmkamtpq3fnq3fkbt0ik@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 20:25:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="01d4ec0c49cb3b974b4b7239ea12869a";
	logging-data="728308"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+88R4DFIWxef8WQbp263yVHy4AH6cFIRw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SmoxzUT6Cy5ZIkZerQ5MTNlXiF8=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <akhg5k9lh38u5elmkamtpq3fnq3fkbt0ik@4ax.com>

On 22/06/2025 19:10, john larkin wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 14:10:07 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
> <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:
> 
>> Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 23:52 this Friday (GMT):
>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 19:16:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2025 01:46:26 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:46:21 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> We use PADS. We've been using it since the DOS days when there was
>>>>>> basically nothing else.
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like it’s still around, but it’s gone cloud-only.
>>>>
>>>> Not for us. We purchased six copies outright.
>>>
>>> Would you entrust mission-critical business operations to obsolete,
>>> unsupported software?
>>
>>
>> A lot of companies do, for one reason or another.
> 
> I inherited a hammer from my grandfather. It pounds nails just fine.

I use 20 year old CAD software. IN a walled garden
-- 
To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.