| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1039m9d$na9a$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: OT: Alan Baker a no-show again Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 15:41:33 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 227 Message-ID: <1039m9d$na9a$1@dont-email.me> References: <vurcsi$2j842$1@dont-email.me> <vuto3j$phvr$2@dont-email.me> <vvl1k2$2r0ig$1@dont-email.me> <vvle6h$2ue8u$7@dont-email.me> <vvsv86$14fvp$1@dont-email.me> <vvt47g$15nlc$2@dont-email.me> <100cuqn$124nm$1@dont-email.me> <100d7tp$123nr$2@dont-email.me> <101l84q$3i2rq$1@dont-email.me> <101l9be$3i852$2@dont-email.me> <10310fe$3si9e$1@dont-email.me> <1031s0n$3tr0e$1@dont-email.me> <1034812$5e0t$2@dont-email.me> <1039frh$a3i$1@dont-email.me> <1039kud$mi6m$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2025 21:41:34 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="457b91578fecd37739cd70f02494bdb4"; logging-data="764202"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yaxWoITUkVCA6Ob3XzzhbSuzgFA72o3E=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:hGLOimSWw6HL0pJ5xPHx+Bc+/uw= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <1039kud$mi6m$4@dont-email.me> On 6/22/25 15:18, Tom Elam wrote: > On 6/22/2025 1:51 PM, -hh wrote: >> On 6/20/25 14:07, Tom Elam wrote: >>> On 6/19/2025 4:30 PM, -hh wrote: >>>> On 6/19/25 08:40, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>> On 6/2/2025 6:41 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2025-06-02 15:21, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/18/2025 2:12 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2025-05-18 08:36, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 5/12/2025 11:30 AM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-05-12 07:05, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/9/2025 1:32 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-05-09 06:57, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/30/2025 7:53 PM, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 13:30, Tom Elam wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Liarchild Baker, pleading something out of his control >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for no doubt, failed to enter the first SCCBC FF weekend >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> event this past week. Apparently his #21 is sitting idle, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for the most part for years now, tires rotting out and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> otherwise rusting away. In the mean time some new drivers >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are showing up and running fast times. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan's window for ever winning a FF season trophy is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closing fast. He has not been competitive for a long, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> long, time. That despite his claim to have run a few fast >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> laps in the past. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LOL! >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> With every post about this, all you demonstrate is your >>>>>>>>>>>>>> own ignorance. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you get your pilot's license without a medical, Liarboy? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, yes: I didn't enter a race that I couldn't attend, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> because I couldn't get a medical, and thus couldn't get my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> license. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm still teaching racing to new students, and despite >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your claims of "a long, long, time", I've been competitive >>>>>>>>>>>>>> every time I've been out. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote from my post "pleading something out of his control". >>>>>>>>>>>>> That could be passing a medical exam. You simply proved you >>>>>>>>>>>>> are too ignorant to read plain English. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> he term "competitive" includes showing up and running a >>>>>>>>>>>>> race. The last time you did even that on a regular base was >>>>>>>>>>>>> 5 or 6 years ago. Last year you ran in one race, had a >>>>>>>>>>>>> wreck, and did not show up again. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You shouldn't post after you've had too much to drink, Liarboy. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Unable to deny facts, you default to deflection again. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You were hardly competitive in the one race you entered last >>>>>>>>>>> year. There are no results to prove that at all. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Are you kidding? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> First, I entered TWO races last year, which you knew. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So you now claiming I only entered one would be a lie, >>>>>>>>>> wouldn't it? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I amend my comment, I should have said you only ran on 1 >>>>>>>>> weekend (September) and in only 1 race that weekend. That's >>>>>>>>> from the club championship page at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And you're still wrong. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.sccbc.net/racers/club-championship/2024-sccbc-club- >>>>>>>>> standings/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I suppose it is possible that you entered other weekends and >>>>>>>>> then canceled. That would not be on the cited record, would it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The substance of the comment is unchanged. You have not >>>>>>>>> competed on a regular basis in years. >>>>>>>> I TOLD you about the other race weekend I participated in last >>>>>>>> year, Asshole. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But it was not a SBBC points race. And as I recall you took the >>>>>>> restrictor plate out to increase power of your already incredible >>>>>>> detuned Honda engine. Fail. >>>>>> >>>>>> I took the restrictor out because I was bored with beating the >>>>>> available FF competition and wanted to see if I could play with >>>>>> the faster classes. >>>>>> >>>>>> And regardless of whether or not it was an SCCBC points race, I >>>>>> did compete in it... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...I still told you about it... >>>>>> >>>>>> ...asshole. >>>>> >>>>> One race completed since 10/9/2022? That's it? >>>>> >>>>> Too embarrassed to admit the truth? Your racing days are over and >>>>> not even 65 yet? Poor health and/or finances? Or just lost >>>>> interest? Come on Alan, be honest for a change. CSMA wants to know >>>>> the truth. >>>> >>>> Once again, besides Alan, the only person who seems to care about it >>>> is a luzer stalker located 2,350 miles away who's never tracked an >>>> open wheel car. >>>> >>>> In any event, just because you're nosy doesn't mean that you have >>>> any right to intrude into peoples' personal lives. >>>> >>>> >>>>> BTW, I just hit 79. Since you last finished a Formula F SCCBC >>>>> points race on October 9, 2022 I have flown on 160 days, 377.7 >>>>> hours, 452 takeoffs/landings of which 159 were CAP cadet flights. >>>>> Also passed all my FAA physicals and checkrides (most recent on >>>>> June 13, 2025) on the first try and as of today I am FAA IFR >>>>> current. Except for some back issues never felt better. >>>> >>>> So what? How many hours of snorkeling & open wheel racing have you >>>> done since Oct 2022? Heaven forbid that Tommy compare Apples to >>>> Oranges! /s >>>> >>>> >>>>> If you ever get a chance to go to Croatia do it. It is a beautiful >>>>> country. >>>> >>>> Gosh someone's forgotten that they've already said that before. >>>> How does the FAA check pilots for senility? /s >>>> >>>> In any event, we've gotten enough of an 'all clear' to be able to >>>> commit to one booking, so things are starting to come back together >>>> finally. Not to brag about it, because that's what self-centered >>>> people do, but suffice to say that it took us roughly five years to >>>> finally get the core element approved. >>>> >>>> >>>> -hh >>> >>> We get checked for senility at every CAP or FAA checkride. >> >> >> And how does that actually work? "Person, Woman, Man, Camera, TV"? >> > > Huh, it's a person knucklehead, a check pilot in the right seat looking > for every deviation from the applicable standards. > > Here is a link to the CAP forms he or she fills out for pilot renewal: > > https://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/media/cms/F_070005A_7EBBF90B76006.pdf > > And the underlying FAA private pilot ACS: > > https://www.faa.gov/training_testing/testing/acs/private_airplane_acs_6.pdf > > For mission pilot - next step beyond just CAP pilot: > > https://www.gocivilairpatrol.com/media/cms/F_070091_C643654236FF9.pdf So? Just which parts of these specifically evaluates for senility? Keyword searches on senile, memory, cognition ... are pretty bare. > > > ========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========