Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<103c4ba$1dc17$8@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: What old Linux distro to run on a old Pentium III PC?
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 18:53:46 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <103c4ba$1dc17$8@dont-email.me>
References: <1031ot5$36t1$1@dont-email.me> <1031uio$4o2c$1@dont-email.me>
 <SR2cnTVgD8D1ccn1nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <o8kmil-9j1.ln1@otis.foo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 19:53:46 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f8fe094e489dee63e2adc8a14c07a93c";
	logging-data="1486887"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+u/pGXNn4YJtH41cz2KsYyxUt4jToKMQ0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GvtdAURWI+4MiN7f4m8rxsB2N5w=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <o8kmil-9j1.ln1@otis.foo>

On 23/06/2025 01:38, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood wrote:
> Groovy hepcat c186282 was jivin' in comp.os.linux.misc on Fri, 20 Jun
> 2025 03:06 pm. It's a cool scene! Dig it.
> 
>>> At Thu, 19 Jun 2025 21:37:07 +0200 "Matthew Camilleri"
>>> <bunkertoshimatty@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> What old Linux distro would be cool to run on this thing?
> 
>    [Snippitty doo-dah.]
> 
>>     Original IBM-PCs ... ummmmmm ...... probably better
>>     with 386's on up.
> 
>    Yes, indeed; especially since Linux has never run at all on lower than
> a 386. It was originally designed for that very architecture.
> 
IIRC the only couple of Unices that ran on a 286 were Xenix and Venix
But ports to 386 were many and various.


-- 
Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early 
twenty-first century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a 
globally average temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and, 
on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer 
projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to 
contemplate a rollback of the industrial age.

Richard Lindzen