| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<103c9pb$1enkg$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android,comp.sys.mac.system,misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Placeholder for Arlen the Apple troll - crying that the mean ole' EU did not ban any iPhones. Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:26:35 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 26 Message-ID: <103c9pb$1enkg$5@dont-email.me> References: <1016lp6$afb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <od-dnYhkZfg2jar1nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@supernews.com> <103c99f$13is$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:26:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3b80cb744d8c33bc55bf1a5a4fb70331"; logging-data="1531536"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ZVe6Op/aFBfl6RosQ1frf7Bp9PoqcjvA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:pb+M4txq29Vnjl5XSnToJ+ODqR0= In-Reply-To: <103c99f$13is$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> Content-Language: en-CA On 2025-06-23 12:18, Marion wrote: > On Wed, 28 May 2025 13:33:31 +0000, Tyrone wrote : > > >> Bottom line is ALL current iPhones meet the specs. > > BTW, all current iPhones (15+) earn a B rating from Apple. Not A. > > <https://regulatoryinfo.apple.com/cwt/api/ext/file?fileId=whitePaperEnergyLabels/EU_Energy_Label_for_iPhone_and_iPad_EN_1749628569689.pdf> Actually: 'For example, Energy Efficiency Index scores for iPhone models on the EU market in June 2025 all qualified for the highest “A” grade' > > It's no longer shocking the Apple trolls *hate* Apple for lying to them. 'but Apple chose to voluntarily derate scores to a “B” grade to minimize the probability that a third-party tester interpreting the regulation differently would achieve a lower grade. We also downgraded scores for the Repeated Free Fall Reliability Class for the same reason.' So that's lying by omission, isn't it? :-)