| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<103cuou$1k1rf$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: That's some good lawyering Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 21:24:46 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 61 Message-ID: <103cuou$1k1rf$1@dont-email.me> References: <103carv$1fkir$1@dont-email.me> <103cb4s$1flur$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 03:24:47 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4a3d4aefc64f77799e4fc9ee04a6846f"; logging-data="1705839"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19LCR/VMZxAJUIPEt1ZtnOL5Kens9uJj4k=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:NjFdnrMOXEmNS92G8LmkoNncicc= X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250623-4, 6/23/2025), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <103cb4s$1flur$1@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-CA On 2025-06-23 3:49 p.m., BTR1701 wrote: > On Jun 23, 2025 at 12:45:03 PM PDT, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> > wrote: > >> Here's a defense attorney that a viewer would never see on tv. >> >> A man is arrested for kidnapping of a minor, later charge changed to >> attempted. At his first bond hearing, with the kidnapping charge, he was >> denied bond. It's not explained but when the charge was changed to >> attempted, he didn't get another bond hearing. >> >> This occurred at a Walmart. He needed a specific type of Tyenol for a sick >> relative he and his daughter were caring for and it wasn't obvious where >> on the shelf it was. He asked for help from a mother in a mobility scooter >> with children hanging on to the scooter. At first the man thought she >> was handicapped but she was able to stand up and was apparently using it >> just to give her children a ride. At one point, she backed into a display, >> knocking it over, and ran over the foot of one of her children but there >> was no serious damage. When she was helping the man, he held her baby >> briefly because he thought the woman, still thinking she was handicapped, >> was about to drop the child, then gave the child back immediately when >> the mother didn't need help any more. This was less than 2 seconds. >> >> He has several normal interactions with the woman and various Walmart >> employees; the woman had interactions with various employees. After >> finding the medicine, he showed it to her in gratitude. >> >> Some time later, she makes the kidnapping allegation to a Walmart >> employee but doesn't want to call the cops herself. In the comments on >> the first video, the mother has done this before. >> >> The defense lawyer has put together a compilation video of store >> security footage. Incredibly, she gets it introduced at the bond hearing >> over prosecution objection because the defendant's calm and friendly >> demeanor is evidence that he isn't a flight risk and isn't dangerous and >> is therefore eligible for bond. >> >> The video, of course, makes the judge sympathetic toward the defendant >> because it's clear if police had reviewed this, there was no evidence to >> support the mother's complaint. It's absurd that it's still being >> prosecuted. >> >> The judge ordered him released on a low bond he could afford. He spent >> 45 days in pre-trial custody. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3MasIV1G8w >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8b0O1F3JtRg >> >> What should the defense attorney do at this point to get the indictment >> dismissed? > > Go to the local news with the video. > > I'd say the woman who complained about the "kidnapping" would be a good candidate for a lawsuit for "grievous prosecution" (or whatever the term is for when someone files charges without genuine grounds against an innocent person) because she's apparently done this before. -- Rhino