Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<103idr1$38ds8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: L.A. Area Deputy Mayor Urges Violent Street Gangs to Attack ICE
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 03:12:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <103idr1$38ds8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <103hi7t$2v87t$1@dont-email.me> <103hrbe$2s8jt$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 05:12:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="534d802a76d4689c7126c8bccb16e42d";
	logging-data="3422088"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YgkKZ6cKXN4oRD15tnSgc"
User-Agent: Usenapp/0.92.2/l for MacOS
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jQupbPV2sL0nxhsqkK9Q+Wjgu9w=

On Jun 25, 2025 at 2:57:01 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:

> On 2025-06-25 3:21 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> 
>>  Cynthia Gonzalez, the deputy mayor of Cudahy, a small enclave in Los
>> Angeles,
>>  recently posted a video calling for the ultra-violent 18th Street Gang and
>>  Florencia 13, an arm of the Mexican Mafia, to rise up against ICE and defend
>>  their territory.
>>  
>> 
>> https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1937684132596686848/vid/avc1/576x1024/7h6nahQC2cX9GUnF.mp4
>>  
>>  The Los Angeles Division of the FBI has opened a criminal investigation into
>>  Gonzalez and has already paid her a visit at her home. Hopefully she was
>>  stupid enough to talk to them.
>>  
>>  Gonzalez' Facebook page reveals her to be a radical, anti-American
>>  "revanchist", a Mexican-American group that seeks to recover Texas, Arizona,
>>  New Mexico and California as territory of Mexico.
>>  
> Wouldn't the speech in the video constitute incitement? If not, what 
> more would she have to say to qualify?

Under Brandenburg vs Ohio, it would have to be exhortation to imminent lawless
action. The video would fail the "imminent" prong of the test.