Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 09:21:28 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <103js28$3he16$6@dont-email.me>
References: <103jquk$3hu2r$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:21:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1c8fd06282cc41f516ad688665ea55cd";
	logging-data="3717158"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18aq40AKUJdWQMENy+kta9XbOjtbscFd1w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z9Au2nx/NURYBcC0qX8fCI4Z/ds=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <103jquk$3hu2r$1@dont-email.me>

On 2025-06-26 09:02, R.Wieser wrote:
> Alan,
> 
>>> No, it wasn't left out, you just missed(?) it.  Hint: the word is
>>> "increased".   You can't talk about change if you only have a single data
>>> point.
>>
>> But you article doesn't compare wired versus wireless.
> 
> And thats than the second thing you "missed" from even just my quote of the
> article.
> 
> Whats next, you missing all the "e"s in the quote and claim it, and thus the
> article, is nonsense ?

The article does not support the contention that using wireless charging 
results in more heat than wired charging.

Period.

> 
> Yes, you *are* playing dumb games - just like you did a couple of years ago,
> which landed you into my "killfile".
So very brave!