| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<103op8r$s6lm$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: California Bill to Prohibit Law Enforcement from Wearing Masks Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 08:04:27 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 53 Message-ID: <103op8r$s6lm$1@dont-email.me> References: <103cdlv$1gc1q$1@dont-email.me> <103crn2$1jhh0$1@dont-email.me> <103cun5$1k32n$1@dont-email.me> <103lsib$3q19$1@dont-email.me> <103mg06$88k4$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 15:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="858ef837f7d2a4421405a4e155d39cdc"; logging-data="924342"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19D0wp4gxN6eV00SeWJd4M9+GiYAzEp2GA=" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:aam/pUng/CsFRxH/GqKpV8kPSJU= X-No-Archive: yes On 2025-06-27 16:13:58 +0000, BTR1701 said: > On Jun 27, 2025 at 3:42:19 AM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> > wrote: > >> On 2025-06-24 01:23:50 +0000, BTR1701 said: >> >>> On Jun 23, 2025 at 5:32:34 PM PDT, "super70s" <super70s@super70s.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 2025-06-23 20:33:04 +0000, BTR1701 said: >>>> >>>>> The 'progressive' pols keep saying there's no legitimate reason for ICE >>>>> agents to cover their faces while engaged in deportation operations, but >>>>> there is actually a helluva good reason to do so: it preserves their ability to >>>>> work undercover in future cases. >>>> >>>> When they start working undercover in this tactless and heavy-handed >>>> roundup they can have that privilege then. >>> >>> They can have the 'privilege' now because agents rotate in and out >>> assignments >>> all the time. You can be an assist on another agent's immigration case >>> today and >>> working undercover on your own child exploitation case or human trafficking >>> case tomorrow. >> >> You're giving those involved in this ragtag operation too much credit > > No, I actually know how things work in a federal law enforcement agency as > opposed to you, with your Hollywood understanding of how law enforcement > works, who just spouts off on Usenet about it. I doubt you know how normal law enforcement procedure works at all jackass, these people have been caught on tape doing exactly what I said. >> -- they appear a bunch of office workers-turned-storm troopers who have >> been filmed brandishing their weapons at innocent bystanders for no >> good reason. Behavior that would get normal law enforcement officers >> fired. > > Then file a lawsuit and get them fired. Or just continue moaning impotently on > Usenet about it. Whatever. You're the one who started impotently moaning on Usenet about California deciding their own policy for face masks when arresting residents on their own streets. But everyone knows "states rights" just depends on what agenda item today's nightmare Trump regime wants to accomplish -- they use it (abortion) and reject it (immigrant roundups) at their convenience.