| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<103p8nk$vtpj$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot? Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 10:28:20 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: <103p8nk$vtpj$1@dont-email.me> References: <103jquk$3hu2r$1@dont-email.me> <103js28$3he16$6@dont-email.me> <103k32t$3jmvs$1@dont-email.me> <103khk0$3he16$10@dont-email.me> <103ljd0$1epb$2@dont-email.me> <103mblo$76oo$4@dont-email.me> <103meq4$83ki$2@dont-email.me> <103mjla$852q$3@dont-email.me> <103mmqd$9qfj$2@dont-email.me> <103mnp9$852q$6@dont-email.me> <103mu89$blrq$2@dont-email.me> <103mubu$bfmd$2@dont-email.me> <103o3rd$nqcq$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 19:28:22 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae8d71abbcc8a4df4ebe069b6b341aad"; logging-data="1046323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zXlUjXMjQfFpIuoBHfVPFmPk0G+H39Eg=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:BpfwZw9T8jA8bE4Mboc1tYAz90E= In-Reply-To: <103o3rd$nqcq$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-CA On 2025-06-27 23:53, R.Wieser wrote: > Alan, > >>>> Since you're claiming "the URL mentions wireless charging", why don't >>>> you just provide it again? >>>> >>>> Tell you what... ...I'll do it: >>>> >>>> <https://uk.pcmag.com/mobile-phones/146275/mobile-myth-does-fast-charging-ruin-your-phone-battery> >>> >>> :-) Yep, playing dumb again. >>> >>> Just one question : what did I quote outof it ? >>> >>> Also, that URL doesn't seem to mention wireless charging, as you yourself >>> mentioned in the above. But you still think that thats the URL I spoke >>> about ? >> >> So show which one you WERE speaking of. > > Nope. You claim, you do the work. Nope. At this point it is most definitely YOUR claim that there is another URL involved.