Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<103p8nk$vtpj$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 10:28:20 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <103p8nk$vtpj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <103jquk$3hu2r$1@dont-email.me> <103js28$3he16$6@dont-email.me>
 <103k32t$3jmvs$1@dont-email.me> <103khk0$3he16$10@dont-email.me>
 <103ljd0$1epb$2@dont-email.me> <103mblo$76oo$4@dont-email.me>
 <103meq4$83ki$2@dont-email.me> <103mjla$852q$3@dont-email.me>
 <103mmqd$9qfj$2@dont-email.me> <103mnp9$852q$6@dont-email.me>
 <103mu89$blrq$2@dont-email.me> <103mubu$bfmd$2@dont-email.me>
 <103o3rd$nqcq$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 19:28:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ae8d71abbcc8a4df4ebe069b6b341aad";
	logging-data="1046323"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19zXlUjXMjQfFpIuoBHfVPFmPk0G+H39Eg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:BpfwZw9T8jA8bE4Mboc1tYAz90E=
In-Reply-To: <103o3rd$nqcq$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-CA

On 2025-06-27 23:53, R.Wieser wrote:
> Alan,
> 
>>>> Since you're claiming "the URL mentions wireless charging", why don't
>>>> you just provide it again?
>>>>
>>>> Tell you what... ...I'll do it:
>>>>
>>>> <https://uk.pcmag.com/mobile-phones/146275/mobile-myth-does-fast-charging-ruin-your-phone-battery>
>>>
>>> :-)   Yep, playing dumb again.
>>>
>>> Just one question : what did I quote outof it ?
>>>
>>> Also, that URL doesn't seem to mention wireless charging, as you yourself
>>> mentioned in the above.  But you still think that thats the URL I spoke
>>> about ?
>>
>> So show which one you WERE speaking of.
> 
> Nope.  You claim, you do the work.

Nope. At this point it is most definitely YOUR claim that there is 
another URL involved.