| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<103q58a$15sbl$5@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: T <T@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10 Subject: Re: Before Dimdows 10 Goes EOL, I'm Testing Linux To Save My Laptop From The Landfill Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:35:06 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 47 Message-ID: <103q58a$15sbl$5@dont-email.me> References: <103i58h$3340l$1@dont-email.me> <0001HW.2E0ED9C9000B5EAF70000A26338F@news.supernews.com> <103n7lb$dqtr$5@dont-email.me> <0001HW.2E10039F001AFAEA70000E53F38F@news.supernews.com> <103plo9$11oht$7@dont-email.me> <ceydnYp15qcs_v31nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc05401ea67946136c3dd5d2857ebe6d"; logging-data="1241461"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/c4G96uX0xs4fy0u5dXf1pN/M0AEbEL7U=" User-Agent: Betterbird (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vyXVEewT3QAlaRNZ+me8j6uRO/s= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <ceydnYp15qcs_v31nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com> On 6/28/25 2:50 PM, % wrote: > T wrote: >> On 6/28/25 4:03 AM, WolfFan wrote: >>> On Jun 27, 2025, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote >>> (in article <103n7lb$dqtr$5@dont-email.me>): >>> >>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 09:53:13 -0400, WolfFan wrote: >>>> >>>>> 1. You don’t have to junk Win 10 if you don’t want to. I have XP and 7 >>>>> machines running, MS bailed on them a long time ago but they still >>>>> work, >>>>> I just have to be careful. ... because they run $150,000 imagesetters, >>>>> that’s why. The imagesetters are very picky about their drivers (not >>>>> really drivers, long story, but the imagesetters won’t work without >>>>> them) and still work, and management will NOT be replacing them as >>>>> long >>>>> as they work. >>>> >>>> Would you entrust mission-critical business functions to obsolete, >>>> unsupported software? >>> >>> that’s why we have spares. The imagesetters shipped with NT4 systems. XP >>> was as far as the older software would go. New imagesetters cost >>> north of >>> 100k, the old ones work, and we have several units, so if one dies >>> and we run >>> out of spares it’s not a big deal until we can gewt a replacement which >>> runs newer software. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. it ain’t broke. >>> >> >> You make a great point. >> >> It always depends on your use. "supported software" is >> not always appropriate. Sometimes yes; sometimes no. >> >> There is a guy on the Windows group that has an off grid >> system running XP. It won't run on newer OS'es. And he >> is in no danger of anything from the Internet anyway. >> He is not on it. >> >> > what is he on ... glue Chuckle. It is a set and forget appliance and not on the Internet. Much like your microwave oven.