Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<103q58a$15sbl$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: T <T@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-10
Subject: Re: Before Dimdows 10 Goes EOL, I'm Testing Linux To Save My Laptop
 From The Landfill
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 18:35:06 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <103q58a$15sbl$5@dont-email.me>
References: <103i58h$3340l$1@dont-email.me>
 <0001HW.2E0ED9C9000B5EAF70000A26338F@news.supernews.com>
 <103n7lb$dqtr$5@dont-email.me>
 <0001HW.2E10039F001AFAEA70000E53F38F@news.supernews.com>
 <103plo9$11oht$7@dont-email.me>
 <ceydnYp15qcs_v31nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 03:35:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="cc05401ea67946136c3dd5d2857ebe6d";
	logging-data="1241461"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/c4G96uX0xs4fy0u5dXf1pN/M0AEbEL7U="
User-Agent: Betterbird (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vyXVEewT3QAlaRNZ+me8j6uRO/s=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <ceydnYp15qcs_v31nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@giganews.com>

On 6/28/25 2:50 PM, % wrote:
> T wrote:
>> On 6/28/25 4:03 AM, WolfFan wrote:
>>> On Jun 27, 2025, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote
>>> (in article <103n7lb$dqtr$5@dont-email.me>):
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 09:53:13 -0400, WolfFan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> 1. You don’t have to junk Win 10 if you don’t want to. I have XP and 7
>>>>> machines running, MS bailed on them a long time ago but they still 
>>>>> work,
>>>>> I just have to be careful. ... because they run $150,000 imagesetters,
>>>>> that’s why. The imagesetters are very picky about their drivers (not
>>>>> really drivers, long story, but the imagesetters won’t work without
>>>>> them) and still work, and management will NOT be replacing them as 
>>>>> long
>>>>> as they work.
>>>>
>>>> Would you entrust mission-critical business functions to obsolete,
>>>> unsupported software?
>>>
>>> that’s why we have spares. The imagesetters shipped with NT4 systems. XP
>>> was as far as the older software would go. New imagesetters cost 
>>> north of
>>> 100k, the old ones work, and we have several units, so if one dies 
>>> and we run
>>> out of spares it’s not a big deal until we can gewt a replacement which
>>> runs newer software. if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. it ain’t broke.
>>>
>>
>> You make a great point.
>>
>> It always depends on your use.  "supported software" is
>> not always appropriate.  Sometimes yes; sometimes no.
>>
>> There is a guy on the Windows group that has an off grid
>> system running XP.  It won't run on newer OS'es.  And he
>> is in no danger of anything from the Internet anyway.
>> He is not on it.
>>
>>
> what is he on ... glue


Chuckle.  It is a set and forget appliance and
not on the Internet.  Much like your microwave
oven.