Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<103qdia$1b4m2$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: more Intel bad news
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 13:56:57 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <103qdia$1b4m2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vlct5kdmhctiu20qpvlior57l393p66p6l@4ax.com>
 <103nrut$m3f2$1@dont-email.me> <Ksg*wX+fA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
 <ib006khi1fb84f5o95ot2en758uj9j7o5b@4ax.com> <103p1vd$tt45$1@dont-email.me>
 <Nsg*AuagA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 05:57:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4ecce88dafe734d373bd499feccf9442";
	logging-data="1413826"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cvcVOfzl2yX1otaAXkKUswRKIvOmdQCk="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2Z2KsXCQVJ9DeikBa2IQsgKmeA0=
In-Reply-To: <Nsg*AuagA@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 250628-6, 29/6/2025), Outbound message

On 29/06/2025 2:12 am, Theo wrote:
> Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote:
>> On 29/06/2025 1:01 am, john larkin wrote:

<snip>

> Philips was good at optics (lighting, medical imaging, LCDs) and the
> semiconductor research divisions were really good. Another company to add to
> the list of messes.

Philips had their "Nat Lab" - natural philosophy laboratory, for 
academic physics, and other pure science stuff - from way back.

The process of getting from pure science to saleable technology didn't 
always run smoothly, but they did have some notable successes.

My wife and I lived and worked in the Netherlands from 1993 to 2012 and 
we did have some contact with that.

>>> When your compensation is mostly the value of your stock options,
>>> complicated things like transistors are an annoyance.
>>
>> Not when they are your entire business.
>>
> Exactly.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney