Article <103v0bl$2d7t8$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<103v0bl$2d7t8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: New infections with the dairy virus not being counted
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 16:42:10 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 72
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <103v0bl$2d7t8$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="99883"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XkTPrX3gVhafNXmeJYhfsfYfffk=
Content-Language: en-US
	DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO,
	FREEMAIL_REPLYTO_END_DIGIT,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED,
	RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,
	URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS,
	USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org

https://hogvet51.substack.com/p/h5n1-dairy-infection-narratives-and

I found this site on dairy influenza, and this article notes most of 
what I have been reporting on.  The lack of testing and epidemiology 
studies.  They still do not know how the cows are getting infected.  The 
claim that contaminated milking equipment might be the source of 
infection or animal contact can't be replicated.  Cows living with 
infected cows do not get infected, and repeated contact with 
contaminated milking equipment failed to transmit the virus.

The missing component in the tests were infected dairy workers working 
with the cattle.

There is also the note that they do not know how the poultry farms are 
getting infected even though they go down around infected dairies. 
Again they fail to note that infected dairy workers likely also work at 
the poultry farms.

It seems crazy that they haven't figured out how dairy workers are 
transmitting the virus to the cows and poultry.

This article also notes that the USDA is not reporting new infections if 
they occur in states that have cleared the virus already.  Apparently 
Colorado has started to report more infected herds, but they aren't 
counted because the herds were previously infected last year.  They 
aren't even noting if it is the D1.1 virus or the B3.13 dairy infection. 
  Nevada and Arizona were infected with the D1.1 genotype, and it turned 
out to be the same lineage that infected the Washington state poultry 
workers, and the Wyoming human patient and the Nevada dairies and dairy 
worker.  These were the poultry workers that got caught leaving 
Washington (several of them were detected as positive in Oregon and sent 
back to Washington).  What likely happened is that some of the infected 
poultry workers or their contacts were not detected and managed to get 
to Nevada and eventually Wyoming and Arizona.  The epidemiology was 
never attempted.  They never tested the dairy workers and never did 
contact tracing between the dairies in Nevada and Arizona.  They knew 
that they didn't get cattle, but they refused to determine if dairy 
workers had moved from state to state.

QUOTE:
We continue to have good evidence that both the B3.13 and D1.1 strains 
persist in infected herds and spread onward to new herds and to poultry 
flocks via unknown mechanisms despite assumed best efforts to contain 
spread with quarantines and increased biosecurity.
END QUOTE:

 From this guys article the missing link to infecting more dairy cattle 
are the dairy workers.  The studies that failed to transmit the virus 
did not have infected dairy workers working with the cattle.  One early 
article noted that dairy workers were likely getting eye infections 
because they wiped their faces with the same towel that they washed the 
cows utters with before applying the suction cups.  Spreading the virus 
could work both ways with that towel.  They refuse to make restricting 
dairy worker movements a requirement for quarantine.  It is still only 
recommended that dairy workers do not work on other farms if they work 
at an infected dairy.  No one should wonder how it spreads to other 
herds after all the infected herds have been identified and quarantined.

It has been known since the first flocks got infected in Michigan that 
dairy workers from infected dairies also worked on the commercial farms 
that got infected.  How the poultry flocks are being infected should be 
no mystery.

This guy also notes that poultry flocks are going down with the dairy 
virus in the Midwest and those states are not reporting infected dairy 
herds as is likely the case.  Everyone understands that the poultry 
flocks are getting infected by the nearby dairy herds, but no one wants 
to admit that dairy workers are taking the virus to the poultry farms.

Ron Okimoto