| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<1040g0q$2qh5c$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Genesis of the Humans Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 11:15:38 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <1040g0q$2qh5c$1@dont-email.me> References: <d256db867cb0f8c466e98ca20469a0a0@dizum.com> <103n0ie$c559$1@dont-email.me> <103or8g$shri$1@dont-email.me> <103pppm$13sad$1@dont-email.me> <103r74d$1g8dd$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p7mkiocz5hdw001@post.eweka.nl> <103rpkt$1jie1$3@dont-email.me> <xn0p7mohv63kgk4000@post.eweka.nl> <103saqo$1nent$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p7nvcie9gy2g001@post.eweka.nl> <103ufhd$29e2d$1@dont-email.me> <xn0p7o6jz7nrukm000@post.eweka.nl> <103vah5$2f5ce$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2025 13:15:39 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c7bb17056aec20fb52ebc877b7e578ff"; logging-data="2966700"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+QTUvn5Ho0MX03A1E65Hm4wtfuklVqUE8=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9LjKbAveThaaVPajersMoIce/Gk= sha1:TETilJ+hoQDEolWg3mUGJzmv3p0= The True loon loves lecturing even when his lessons are lousy: > On 30/06/2025 20:23, Blueshirt wrote: > >> >> YOU might be on about ancient kings that their citizens thought >> were gods based on the manuscripts you've read from centuries >> past, but that is not the thoughts of a lot of the general >> public who follow an organised religion... or the sort of thing >> that was being discussed here. >> > > What is being discussed here is Genesis and I am explaining where > the stories originally came from. > ** SNIP ** > > It was never about ribs. It was about sides and I've shown you that the > original source of the story was known to Plato, Aristophanes, and > Socrates. > That’s a bit misleading. Like I said in my other post, it’s probably more like the Bible and your Greek guys were drawing on similar sources and traditions but putting their own unique twists on the story. You can’t simply say there’s a direct one-to-one match between the Greek story and the Biblical one. The differences are as important as the similarities. -- solar penguin