| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104223l$359oi$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 Subject: Re: Falling Windows Market Share Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2025 21:30:27 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 39 Message-ID: <104223l$359oi$1@dont-email.me> References: <103f89a$29m22$1@dont-email.me> <104203k$34nju$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2025 03:30:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2900ee69f2c0793c24b6b4808ea7be52"; logging-data="3319570"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4N0iMu4TTkVQQ4ifQo3v6IMh/KLeRXZw=" User-Agent: Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802) Cancel-Lock: sha1:O3+OjmwbtGUQA+/3HIbxSboQISc= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <104203k$34nju$2@dont-email.me> On Tue, 7/1/2025 8:56 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 22:19:23 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > >> As recently as 3 years ago, Microsoft trumpeted an installed base of >> 1.4 billion Windows PCs; but the best it can say today is “over a >> billion”. > > Microsoft has revised the blog post in question to restore the 1.4 > billion number > <https://www.tomshardware.com/software/windows/windows-seemingly-lost-400-million-users-in-the-past-three-years-official-microsoft-statements-show-hints-of-a-shrinking-user-base>. > > Still, though, the idea that users might be jumping ship to go to > Apple’s Macintosh isn’t borne out by Apple’s figures, either. > We know how price-sensitive the majority of the market is, and especially... this week. During a normal time, you might be tempted to do something different. Apple is making something, using one of their phone processors, which represents an effort to compete. Not that I would buy such a contraption. Tomshardware had a "funny" case of a Reddit user, who spent $20,000 on a THreadRipper (on one of those $1100 motherboards), and after a BIOS flash update, can't get it to work properly. Generally, I buy the minimal core components on an expensive build, just to prove in the thing and reduce my risk if the thing catches fire or something :-) One person on the Reddit thread mentioned the right approach. If you're building an ECC system on AMD, you buy a single 8GB stick of *non-ECC* memory, and that's to work around BIOS bugs and make forward progress. Similarly, you pick up a junky video card (making sure it actually works), and use that for bringup. And that's to prove that spending big bucks on a couple nice video cards, is not a mistake if the core system won't work. Paul