Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad
Subject: Re: Why is the iPhone so inefficient compared to Android?
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:27:47 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1046p43$1n605$1@solani.org>
References: <103s7ql$2qh$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <103sd52$1gau4$1@solani.org>
 <1041121$30ui$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <10418j8$2vien$1@dont-email.me>
 <1041abk$2eus$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <1041dsv$3123c$1@dont-email.me>
 <1041koo$r1u$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <1041nrs$33b45$1@dont-email.me>
 <1041qjf$33qmn$1@dont-email.me>
 <1044bgi$vdb$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <1046f4r$9eff$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 20:27:47 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1808389"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O2Te9Dfd2lIilnUCejvcptlbY4g= sha1:wRoJ8Ojpzp0wMNMpUj2TdB8MxuM=
X-User-ID: eJwNycEBwCAIA8CVQEmi46DC/iO09z1MOq+CYKDRNdz6VC7WPyGOFTXH24F3zZVSFLz2sAyPy8NjoqSuBeQHO50Uqw==

Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2025-07-02 15:23, Marion wrote:
>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 19:22:23 -0400, -hh wrote :
>> 
>> 
>>> Too bad he didn't know what you noted later, about how Apple
>>> tested as an "A" but decided to report as a "B".
>> 
>> Heh heh heh... Only Apple whined like a little girl about the test.
>> 
>> Nobody Else.
>> Just Apple.
>> 
>> Apple used the same test & same 3rd-party tester everyone else used.
>> Only Apple couldn't earn an A. Almost every Android OEM did.
>> 
>> Guess who whined that they didn't like the test.
>> Heh heh heh... only Apple.
>> 
>> The rest said what I said, which is:
>> a. Apple is on the committee that defined the standards!
> 
> That is an assertion unsupported by any facts.
> 
>> b. Apple has known about the test requirements for years!
> 
> That is an assertion unsupported by any facts.
> 
>> c. Apple used the same company that everyone else used!
> 
> That is an assertion unsupported by any facts.
> 

You remind me of this guy that I debate sports with. I back up my points
with actual cites and examples, but all he does is say “nope” without
actually debating the topic or providing counter cites.