| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104apto$1d6ik$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Claude.ai provides reasoning why I may have defeated the conventional HP proof Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 12:06:00 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 13 Message-ID: <104apto$1d6ik$1@dont-email.me> References: <1049cr4$10io1$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2025 11:06:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="82a2e544543608455dc7526c0954e1b6"; logging-data="1481300"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19QOFanmLJ80RP/7x+QD1r5" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:luvB/vqAj+2cOk1y7MbgKCxARsw= On 2025-07-04 20:16:34 +0000, olcott said: > https://claude.ai/share/48aab578-aec3-44a5-8bb3-6851e0f8b02e Perhaps an artificial idiot can think better than you but it does not think better than most participants of these discussions. What is not provable is not analytic truth. Opinions of artificial idiots are not relevant. You have not proven any of your claims. -- Mikko