Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<104enjs$2ef51$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "R.Wieser" <address@is.invalid>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What's the actual *advantage* of not having an sd slot?
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 22:50:58 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <104enjs$2ef51$1@dont-email.me>
References: <103897u$cpuv$1@dont-email.me> <103pnug$13e4d$1@dont-email.me> <mj76jlxcnu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <103q0r2$158i6$1@dont-email.me> <1041fl5.144o.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <1041t4i$1v9c$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <1043f89.nc4.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <1044aqf$32b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <10466v7.qpg.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <104e24q$s3u$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2025 22:51:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9e6f758b01d8e4bc8180994dbad1f8aa";
	logging-data="2571425"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/kN2/QGhBwb0bFvNXCpODHn7i91xO4yRB2f2+QeYkUTQ=="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cu9fl6aqqSOd5NR5kFkqVM/2FnA=
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5512
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512

Marion,

> I'm an extremely well educated scientist & engineer so it's
> important that I tell you all my stated facts are aimed at
> being 100% correct.

"aimed at" ?  Sure.  I can jump and aim for the moon.  Though /just like 
you/, I always seem to fall short. :-)

> The fact is, you're wrong - and the proof of that is you can't
> back it up.  > You won't find even a single time where my stated
> facts were wrong.(1)

Lolz!  You have made a *mountain* of claims which you have not "backed up" - 
and when asked to do so you flatout ignored such requests.

And nonwithstanding your own refusal you now again demand others to support 
theirs - and if that is not enough, you even have the gall to demand that 
your opponents explain/support *your* claims.

> The reason is what you disagree with are my assessments.
> And that's fine.

Thank you, we really where waiting for you, grand magus of throwing 
unsubstanciated claims around, to allow us to disagree with you. :-)

As for your "assessments" ?   You have shown to be unable to even just 
/explain/ where you got them from.

> But never say a fact I state is wrong, Frank.
> Without backing it up with a cite because it doesn't happen(1).

I suggest you *never* claim that *anything* you say is "right" or "a fact" 
kiddo, not without backing it up yourself.

As you seem to be allergic to that your whole grand-standing about all your 
education and knowledge means exactly nothing to me, and likely to anyone 
else reading your posts.

Ah yes, I forgot : you demanded from Carlos that he proved his education to 
you.  Did you ever prove you *alledged* education to him ?   No, I didn't 
think so.  Hypocrite.

As for that "it doesn't happen(1)" ?   That sounds quite contrary to your 
caveat, being "I can make temporary errors".

Kiddo, your single most important "temporary" error is that you outsmart and 
know more than anyone here.

> If an actual fact I stated is wrong, in my entire history on Usenet,
> I've always apologized and publicly corrected it

Don't lie to us.  Every time you've been told you made a mistake your 
response was to bluntly ignore it.

> as my statements must be trusted to be 100% correct on the facts.

Lolz.  As far as I can tell absolutily *nobody* here believes that what you 
claim to be facts comes even *near* to being such.

Kiddo, the manner in which you started this very subject shows us that you 
are quite dishonest.  Besides you refusing, even when I asked, to specify 
what you where talking about I mean.

Bottom line ?   Even with all your goal-post moving you have yet to win a 
single argument.  And that for someone who claims to have a higher education 
and is quite knowledgable.

> In decades of posting on Usenet, Frank...

For someone *that* old you should have become aware of what "a discussion" 
is. What you are doing (here) isn't even in the same galaxy.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser