Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<104erpg$2f62e$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-07-04 (Friday - The 4th of July!!)
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 22:02:24 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <104erpg$2f62e$3@dont-email.me>
References: <104cccl$1oedc$1@dont-email.me> <1088825095.773475262.007689.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <104eeck$2bgt7$1@dont-email.me> <104eptg$2dsqb$12@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:02:25 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fba57990532f75bdb36fc64909d354f";
	logging-data="2594894"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4geLjUBbuLEa1Ew5+SqtIPbSTZCqFjB0="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PEYYSWviO1DiWiKoWvTi5fKGTbY=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>Jul 6, 2025 at 10:45:34 AM PDT, Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org>

>>Battleship (4K disc) 2012 sci-fi movie based on the board game.  A group 
>>of young sailors must battle an alien invasion force at sea.  I know 
>>this movie has a bad reputation, but I actually like it a lot.  I 
>>especially like towards the end when in order to get back into the fight 
>>they retrofit the USS Missouri and set sail with it along with some old 
>>timers who still knew how to operate the ship.

>I know you've expressed your love for this movie before but for me, there's a
>limit to how absurd a movie can be before I really can't suspend the disbelief
>anymore.

>The sequence with the Missouri was such a bizarre plot development on so many
>levels. The ship has been stripped of all its engines and the barrels are all
>that's left of those big guns. All the breaches and internal firing mechanisms
>are long gone. But even if we were to assume that all of that equipment was
>still inexplicably in place and functional, why would a floating museum be
>fully fueled? And where did all the ammo for the guns come from? The powder
>bags that fire those guns weigh 660 pounds and are loaded in by crane. Are we
>supposed to assume the Navy was storing live ammo for the 16-inch guns on
>board just for the hell of it? And even if we assume all of that, the final
>cherry on that ridiculous sundae was how all those octogenarian geezers were
>apparently just hanging out on the masts and yardarms of the ship in dramatic
>poses for... what? Hawaii is under attack by space aliens, so all the
>80-year-old WWII vets psychically decide at the same moment to go down to
>Pearl Harbor and pose dramatically on their old ship?

>It was just too, too, too much for this viewer to 'just go with it'. The movie
>wouldn't have been any more ridiculous at that point if Taylor Kitch had
>suddenly and inexplicably become Superman and started flying around killing
>the aliens with his laser-beam eyes or something.

Hey! I sort of liked him as John Carter! No laser eyes though.