| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<104erpg$2f62e$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2025-07-04 (Friday - The 4th of July!!) Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 22:02:24 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <104erpg$2f62e$3@dont-email.me> References: <104cccl$1oedc$1@dont-email.me> <1088825095.773475262.007689.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com> <104eeck$2bgt7$1@dont-email.me> <104eptg$2dsqb$12@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2025 00:02:25 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4fba57990532f75bdb36fc64909d354f"; logging-data="2594894"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4geLjUBbuLEa1Ew5+SqtIPbSTZCqFjB0=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:PEYYSWviO1DiWiKoWvTi5fKGTbY= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote: >Jul 6, 2025 at 10:45:34 AM PDT, Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> >>Battleship (4K disc) 2012 sci-fi movie based on the board game. A group >>of young sailors must battle an alien invasion force at sea. I know >>this movie has a bad reputation, but I actually like it a lot. I >>especially like towards the end when in order to get back into the fight >>they retrofit the USS Missouri and set sail with it along with some old >>timers who still knew how to operate the ship. >I know you've expressed your love for this movie before but for me, there's a >limit to how absurd a movie can be before I really can't suspend the disbelief >anymore. >The sequence with the Missouri was such a bizarre plot development on so many >levels. The ship has been stripped of all its engines and the barrels are all >that's left of those big guns. All the breaches and internal firing mechanisms >are long gone. But even if we were to assume that all of that equipment was >still inexplicably in place and functional, why would a floating museum be >fully fueled? And where did all the ammo for the guns come from? The powder >bags that fire those guns weigh 660 pounds and are loaded in by crane. Are we >supposed to assume the Navy was storing live ammo for the 16-inch guns on >board just for the hell of it? And even if we assume all of that, the final >cherry on that ridiculous sundae was how all those octogenarian geezers were >apparently just hanging out on the masts and yardarms of the ship in dramatic >poses for... what? Hawaii is under attack by space aliens, so all the >80-year-old WWII vets psychically decide at the same moment to go down to >Pearl Harbor and pose dramatically on their old ship? >It was just too, too, too much for this viewer to 'just go with it'. The movie >wouldn't have been any more ridiculous at that point if Taylor Kitch had >suddenly and inexplicably become Superman and started flying around killing >the aliens with his laser-beam eyes or something. Hey! I sort of liked him as John Carter! No laser eyes though.